Live data from Hacker News

Nixie – Wearable camera that can fly [video]

flynixie.com

11–20 of 55 posts

Re: Nixie – Wearable camera that can fly [video]

#11
post #6

> Nixie is in development. What kind of development? Are you trying to figure out if you can do it? Are you building the first prototype? Do you have a prototype? Are you working towards making it mass-producable? Don't just waffle, actually tell people where you are. Otherwise you run a good risk of being mistaken for snake oil peddlers.

From engadget 2 weeks ago:

>For now, it's just a delicate prototype that can fly off your wrist and not do much else.

http://www.engadget.com/2014/09/29/nixie-wearable-drone/

Re: Nixie – Wearable camera that can fly [video]

#13
post #6

> Nixie is in development. What kind of development? Are you trying to figure out if you can do it? Are you building the first prototype? Do you have a prototype? Are you working towards making it mass-producable? Don't just waffle, actually tell people where you are. Otherwise you run a good risk of being mistaken for snake oil peddlers.

It's the usual waste-of-space website design. Let's fill the front page with photos and bios of ourselves, while not bothering to include any useful information about the actual product.

Re: Nixie – Wearable camera that can fly [video]

#15
post #14

I think the headaches of the FAA in their efforts to define the approved use of drones, has yet to begin.

I could be mistaken, but I thought the various aviation organisations only needed to be involved if the drones reach a certain altitude.

At least I believe this is the rules for flying model planes in the UK. Other countries might differ.

Re: Nixie – Wearable camera that can fly [video]

#16
post #6

> Nixie is in development. What kind of development? Are you trying to figure out if you can do it? Are you building the first prototype? Do you have a prototype? Are you working towards making it mass-producable? Don't just waffle, actually tell people where you are. Otherwise you run a good risk of being mistaken for snake oil peddlers.

It's the usual waste-of-space website design. Let's fill the front page with photos and bios of ourselves, while not bothering to include any useful information about the actual product.

Or maybe the team they've assembled is working on exactly that. At this stage - it's not really yet a product, but a concept. Instead of shitting on their website design, why not wait a while to see if this collection of seemingly talented people with a common goal are able to accomplish what they've set out to do?

Re: Nixie – Wearable camera that can fly [video]

#18
I was really interested when I saw this the other day and it is an awesome idea but as others have mentioned I wish they would give some details on how they plan to address some of the key issues.

Most importantly and an issue which seems to have been affecting drones in general is battery life. Even current commercially successful drones only last a matter of minutes before needing to be recharged and they are several times the size of the nixie and dont have cameras to deal with. What happens if you are climbing as in the video and 3 minutes later the battery starts dying while you are stuck on a mountain face?

I've liked the concept ever since I heard about quadcopters though and I think it has a lot of potential. From the video I think they're suggesting that you could have an option which sets the Nixie up so that you basically just throw it in the air and it will track + record you. This is obviously a big software challenge (motion tracking the target) that they will have to face although still arguably easier than battery life or flight stability in bad weather conditions.

If they launch it as a glorified selfie taker though I think it would be a shame as it could do so much more. As shown it could compete with the GoPro - hands free and a much desired camera angle - for filming sports, as well as things like amateur TV/film recording, surveying, mapping, etc. That extra functionality could all be added with software updates, its the hardware and physical design which I'm hoping they have a secret answer to.

Re: Nixie – Wearable camera that can fly [video]

#19
post #10
post #3

But do you need to control it with your phone? It looks awesome if you can just release and that's it, without the need to control the camera.

I think that would defeat the purpose, I'm sure you can set waypoints, like with current off the shelve drones, or have auto target tracking software (already exists in some cameras). The real difficulty as far as I know (for automated drone cameras) is tracking elevation without an operator, for what I know the error via GPS data is really large *like =- 5000 ft, and completely unreliable with real features (like th…

Tracking altitude is usually done using a fusion of GPS and barometer. This still isn't perfect because a barometer is highly susceptible to atmospheric conditions, wind, etc, but it's a lot better than GPS alone and tends to work pretty well.

Re: Nixie – Wearable camera that can fly [video]

#20
post #10
post #3

But do you need to control it with your phone? It looks awesome if you can just release and that's it, without the need to control the camera.

I think that would defeat the purpose, I'm sure you can set waypoints, like with current off the shelve drones, or have auto target tracking software (already exists in some cameras). The real difficulty as far as I know (for automated drone cameras) is tracking elevation without an operator, for what I know the error via GPS data is really large *like =- 5000 ft, and completely unreliable with real features (like th…

Using the wrist thingy as a beacon, and assuming you can detect the angle and distance with decent accuracy, wouldn't it be possible to detect where you are relative to the user? Then you could film her/him from a few meters away without really caring where you are relative to "the world". You wouldn't even need GPS, just the beacon sensor and a 3-axis accelerometer.
Post reply on HN