Live data from Hacker News

The Microsoft Empire Reboots

vanityfair.com

121–130 of 173 posts

Re: The Microsoft Empire Reboots

#121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you really want the window manager to handle your browser windows then just open new windows instead of opening tabs. All of your window manager's fancy window switching features, etc. will work.

I think the problem isn't that tabbed browsing exists, but that window managers are not good enough to handle user experience as well as tabbed browsing does.

And the fact that tabs exist isn't stopping window managers from getting better at it. They just haven't.

It seems that putting the application in control of its window-switching experience has just worked out better.

Re: The Microsoft Empire Reboots

#122
post #117

Microsoft has some of the most amazing products and many terrific engineers. Unfortunately, it is also has some extremely negative associations, most of which have been earned and even, perhaps, proven. * unfair and sometimes illegal business practices * sabotage of innovative technologies when they conflict with Microsoft's monopolies * eugenics * empire * surveillance state (Skype/NSA)

Eugenics? Are you high or just incredibly stupid and listen to that nut job Alex Jones?

Re: The Microsoft Empire Reboots

#123
Bethany McLean is the best in business writing. The Smartest Guys in the Room was fantastic.

As for Microsoft: the adage goes that success has many fathers. Failure has even more. It would have been nothing short of amazing if Microsoft was as dominant now as it was in the early days of PCs.

Re: The Microsoft Empire Reboots

#124
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yup, and if you are trying to do the full stack, you had better toss in some node.js or Ruby on Rails, plus SQL. Web development is really hard for non-developers to grok. I keep thinking back to an Access application that I threw together in a couple of days, back in the 90s for managing a team of about 40 technicians. It was being used for task tracking, and had some wiki-like features as well. When I started that…

You're idealizing Access for reasons unknown. If there actually was demand for such a tool, one would exist and would be making a ton of money. The fact that people use off the shelf SaaS is an indication of the fact that off the shelf SaaS is what they want. My suspicion is that Access is too hard for most business people, yet not powerful enough for actual developers to make something unique with. Salesforce has ma…

> My suspicion is that Access is too hard for most business people, yet not powerful enough for actual developers to make something unique with.

At our company, we have an Access "thing" (it's not even an application, really) for generating listings of the phone numbers and birthdays of all the employees.

Recently, for no apparent reason, it stopped working. I consider myself moderately competent at getting up to speed with new development tools and reading myself into other people's code if I have to, but Access somehow is completely incomprehensible to me.

Maybe I was just missing something fundamental, but I found Access hugely frustrating and not intuitive at all. The general idea behind it seems actually kind of good, but the Microsoft chose to implement it is not exactly optimal. Also, as usual for MS, the complete lack of a manual made me want to strangle somebody. So, yeah, I totally agree with your statement. :)

Re: The Microsoft Empire Reboots

#125
post #117

Microsoft has some of the most amazing products and many terrific engineers. Unfortunately, it is also has some extremely negative associations, most of which have been earned and even, perhaps, proven. * unfair and sometimes illegal business practices * sabotage of innovative technologies when they conflict with Microsoft's monopolies * eugenics * empire * surveillance state (Skype/NSA)

Eugenics? Are you high or just incredibly stupid and listen to that nut job Alex Jones?

I'm not high or stupid. Eugenics has earned a very poor reputation, but its advocacy is still going strong under other names. Bill Gates and his family have a long history of promoting it, unfortunately.

Re: The Microsoft Empire Reboots

#126
post #41
post #6

(I think) it's not hard to understand where microsoft went wrong. Ballmer just doesn't seem to get where the industry is going. As evidence, this quote from the article: Indeed, Ballmer seemed to have no intention of leaving when he announced a massive reorganization of the entire company in July 2013. Behind the scenes he had also begun negotiating an acquisition that was meant to transform Microsoft. He had become…

Either way, differentiated companies -- apple -- require completely different strategies than nondifferentiated -- samsung. How is Apple differentiated? To a user that wants a smartphone to send emails, visit websites, play fantasy football, take pictures, etc, Apple is every bit in competition with Xiaomi as Samsung is. To many, many users, smartphones are effectively a commodity now. Which is why Apple devices feat…

Apple stopped selling it on their website. I heard they've stopped producing it and what you see in stores now is the remaining stock - what's your source that they're still making it?

Furthermore, the virgin mobile link you gave is for no contract - but locked phone. While it's not comparable to $200-with-a-2-year-contract, it is also not comparable to an unlocked phone.

Re: The Microsoft Empire Reboots

#127
post #76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Winforms is fine, not as powerful as what came before it but otherwise good. The problem with winforms is WPF supposedly deprecating it.

WPF has a much steeper learning curve though. For non customer facing desktop programs, WinForms is fine.

I don't think WPF has been successful in replacing winforms, more that it was a hard sell to management to use winforms after WPF was announced.

Re: The Microsoft Empire Reboots

#128
post #80
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That might be one of the mistakes, but it isn't the start of the problem. Tangibly, it's either United States v. Microsoft Corporation or Longhorn / Vista. Intangibly, it's the attitude that permeated the company that said "we are right because we are Microsoft." There were few people you could talk to who'd think you had anything to offer someone who worked at Microsoft. You still see this today around products like…

This rings true. I had some relations with Microsoft last year and it's incredible how inward-looking they are. They spend most of the time telling you how great everything Microsoft-like is or will be, and don't seem to be well aware of the outside world. They know there are things like iPhones and Android devices, but they appear truly baffled that anyone would want one. They think it's some kind of conspiratory re…

With most companies, the center of gravity is obviously on the customer side. The customer, and the market, is ultimately the boss. With the customer lies the product/market fit, the fickle and life-giving revenue stream, the demand that drives features and product and ultimately existential corporate strategy.

But when you achieve the dominance and size and cash hoard of Microsoft, that center of gravity shifts -- the company becomes so powerful and massive that it generates its own gravity. There is the luxury of a cushion so large that it recedes to infinity, distorting strategy to the point where the necessity of its convergence with the customer may no longer be explicitly contemplated. The wooing of the customer is supplanted by an eternal dance of indoctrinated partners in the ecosystem ballroom. The objective financial success of the arrangement trumpets it to become ever more like itself, unfettered and unfed by the market forces and demand that anneal smaller and more nimble competitors.

And so, numbly disconnected from the healthy signals of the natural customer-centric gravitational pull, this dominant entity finally reaches the ballistic apex of its trajectory, unpowered by the thrust of customer focus, and begins its gradual descent. Maybe the law of large numbers, with respect to enterprise growth, is really more of an inward-looking organizational behavior problem than one of stock market psychology.

Re: The Microsoft Empire Reboots

#129

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sure, but it's crap that gets those Enterprises from A to B. What I want to know is, what better crap is there that offers the ease of use that webforms does? If there's nothing better then this is the best crap we have. It's kind of like how gas-guzzling, environment-ruining automobiles in general are crappy, but what practical alternatives exist that actually cover all of the use cases?

Programmers seem to as a matter of principle be vehemently opposed to the notion of cost / benefit being at least as important as "technical correctness" or whatever you want to call it. If its cheap, sustainable, and satisfies user requirements, that should be enough, should it not?

I see it as the same reason chefs don't like cutting carrots with table knives. It's a lot cheaper than a nice knife, and the carrots get all mushed up in the stew either way. But a nice knife is just a joy to use, and when you cut carrots all day, you want something that is a joy to use.

Re: The Microsoft Empire Reboots

#130
post #119
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Samsung spends significantly more on marketing their mobile devices than Apple does. Samsung is estimated to have spent, in total, $364 million in 2013 in the US. Apple is estimated to have spent $350 million. Is that really "significantly more", especially given that Samsung's total mobile device market is wider than Apple's (e.g. feature phones and so on). Indeed, thinking in terms of purely smartphones -- I see at…

Marketing isn't just advertising. The last chart illustrates the massive difference in marketing spend between Apple and Samsung. http://www.asymco.com/2013/04/02/the-cost-of-selling-galaxie...

The number I gave was Samsung and Apple US spend for promotions on mobile. The Asymco link you gave is for Samsung Electronics, which is the whole that makes televisions, cameras, printers, semiconductors, and so on. That number is a garbage comparison, but somehow, and conveniently, it is the one that is always referenced when pushing the "Samsung advertises so much more" angle.
Post reply on HN