Live data from Hacker News

Paul Graham and Jessica Livingston Interview [video]

bloomberg.com

41–50 of 69 posts

Re: Paul Graham and Jessica Livingston Interview [video]

#41
post #14

As others are saying: almost unwatchable due to the bad editing. The site also has a ton of tracking going on. Seems to me this interview is all about (Bloomberg/YC) advertising. But I got one interesting quote from PG. Funding multiple startups at once gives the startups the benefit of having colleagues. It's nice to have others around while working on your own idea. Maybe this could be the standard in bigger compan…

It doesn't help with video editing, but you can avoid the other stuff by downloading the video with youtube-dl[1]. Yes, it works on sites other than youtube. Sometimes[2]. [1] https://rg3.github.io/youtube-dl/download.html [2] https://rg3.github.io/youtube-dl/supportedsites.html

Most of the time I could download any video on any place with youtuve-dl.

Sometimes I have to read the source code of the page and change the web address I give it the program, though.

Re: Paul Graham and Jessica Livingston Interview [video]

#42

Interviewer is annoying as hell, and the editing is horrible!

I think she's alright, but would have definitely liked someone like Sarah Lacy doing the interview. I know people have different opinions about her, but I really like her interviewing style, seems much more personal.

Sarah is a great interviewer, only realized that when I watched more interviews from others.

Re: Paul Graham and Jessica Livingston Interview [video]

#43
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Made you smile because you think he actually had already done the math? Or because he did it fast right there and corrected her? I smiled too, because of the latter.

There's volumes there. Some combination of the sentiment that $900 million isn't nearly the most interesting thing going on about YC [+] and the notion that while $900 million isn't important enough to think about you'd have to correct a math error on it because math. [+] A totally reasonable sentiment, which makes me smile in about three different ways. Once for not caring about money, once for having the luxury to…

Well, to know that it wasn't enough money to care about you would first have to have done the math to know that it was only $900M.

I like your first point about it not being about the money. I suspect it's more about proving that their new (at the time) approach to startup investing, their new appreciation for founders, their completely differnt model was right and that the conventional wisdom that came before them was wrong. At least that would be my biggest satisfaction.

Re: Paul Graham and Jessica Livingston Interview [video]

#44
Paul Graham is somewhat of a modern day hero. Forget the rappers and the athletes, he is the embodiment of a good, moral and sensible person. Great husband and parent, great sense of humor, and all of this aside from what he has done for the tech/startup community.

Re: Paul Graham and Jessica Livingston Interview [video]

#46

Is it just me, or did this interview go by too quickly? No silence between question, way too choppy. Can someone get them two on Charlie Rose? Edit: Just saw the comment I was looking for. Apparently it was the editing.

It is just post-editing they cut away all unnecessary scenes

Re: Paul Graham and Jessica Livingston Interview [video]

#50

Really curious what Boosted Boards' 'bigger ambitions than making skateboards' are! A friend has one of their Kickstarter boards and it's unreal.

The boards are a way to make sales while they create better batteries. Batteries are often the limiting factor in current tech products.
Post reply on HN