Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Weev: “Women in tech”, doxing, Kathy Sierra, and the koolaid

weev.livejournal.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

11–20 of 25 posts

Re: Weev: “Women in tech”, doxing, Kathy Sierra, and the koolaid

#11

Post by rabite »

[deleted] wrote: post #4
rabite wrote: post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

what about the presentation of facts and evidence is insane?

[deleted]

I am a white nationalist, not a nazi. That means I believe whites are being systematically attacked and I work in my free time to defend my race from utter destruction. However, at work I leave my politics at the door, and I have colleagues that are diverse in terms of both gender and ethnic origin.

Now please explain how my politics changes the fact that I did not make the full-disclosure post dropping Kathy Sierra's dox, with the mail headers of the post verifying my claim? How does that change the fact that the media and social justice community has consistently cheered dox dropping, but goes into outrage mode when it happens to one of their own?

It doesn't matter what my politics or identity is. What matters is that there is hypocrisy and fraud being committed, and that people should know that.

Re: Weev: “Women in tech”, doxing, Kathy Sierra, and the koolaid

#12

Post by lhnz »

deadweight wrote: post #6

Weev, is a stain, and this drivel not worthy of comment. I would very much like Weev and all his demented little groupies to simply drift off into obscurity. The only thing that needs to fuck off Weev, is you.

Not an appropriate comment for HN.

  >> Be civil. [0]
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re: Weev: “Women in tech”, doxing, Kathy Sierra, and the koolaid

#14

Post by rabite »

michaelochurch wrote: post #10
rabite wrote: post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

what about the presentation of facts and evidence is insane?

The fact that you're a weaker version of a Silktail.

In the black sun's light

I am become black rabite

destroyer of knights

Re: Weev: “Women in tech”, doxing, Kathy Sierra, and the koolaid

#15

Post by gorgonn »

rabite wrote: post #11
[deleted] wrote: post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[deleted]

I am a white nationalist, not a nazi. That means I believe whites are being systematically attacked and I work in my free time to defend my race from utter destruction. However, at work I leave my politics at the door, and I have colleagues that are diverse in terms of both gender and ethnic origin. Now please explain how my politics changes the fact that I did not make the full-disclosure post dropping Kathy Sierra'…

I agree with most aspects of your blog post, but I disagree that white men/women are being attacked at anywhere near the scale you claim. I am a stereotypical white man, for reference.

I think this whining is not much better than the bloviating and crying exhibited by SJWs. In other words, you're close to stooping to their level. The Arrington situation was much more about him being a man than being white (though I am not a MRA).

These frankly insane people should be ignored, not fed with "no you're actually oppressing MY group, not the opposite!" or "well if it's okay for them to do it then it should be okay for me (re: doxing)."

They're parasites. Don't give them more veins to suck from.

Re: Weev: “Women in tech”, doxing, Kathy Sierra, and the koolaid

#16

Post by JohnDoe1 »

Has anyone ever noticed that when someone writes something that is contrary to the mainstream narrative, the mainstream labels it as a 'manifesto' or a 'screed'?

What about what Andrew said is reprehensible? Oh, sure, the whole Kathy Sierra dongtrain was eWreckage (and Weev, ffs let it go, let the woman say whatever she wants, leave it be) but his prevailing point- that the victimology-as-a-profile-raiser strategy that many otherwise irrelevant women seem to be employing is pretty bogus, albeit en vogue right now.

Re: Weev: “Women in tech”, doxing, Kathy Sierra, and the koolaid

#18

Post by deadweight »

lhnz wrote: post #12
deadweight wrote: post #6

Weev, is a stain, and this drivel not worthy of comment. I would very much like Weev and all his demented little groupies to simply drift off into obscurity. The only thing that needs to fuck off Weev, is you.

Not an appropriate comment for HN. >> Be civil. [0] [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

You're cherry picking. The guideline, and I want to stress that it's a guideline and not a rule or EULA.

>> Be civil. Don't say things you wouldn't say in a face to face conversation.

When it comes to racist, sexist, hatemongers who derive pleasure from causing other people suffering, this is as civil as it gets. I also want to assure you; I would make the same comment in person.

Re: Weev: “Women in tech”, doxing, Kathy Sierra, and the koolaid

#19

Post by gorgonn »

JohnDoe1 wrote: post #16

Has anyone ever noticed that when someone writes something that is contrary to the mainstream narrative, the mainstream labels it as a 'manifesto' or a 'screed'? What about what Andrew said is reprehensible? Oh, sure, the whole Kathy Sierra dongtrain was eWreckage (and Weev, ffs let it go, let the woman say whatever she wants, leave it be) but his prevailing point- that the victimology-as-a-profile-raiser strategy th…

Weev is known for some pretty unusual and even extreme beliefs. That's partially why. He's a self admitted white nationalist (I very much am not, nor are most of us).

I agree that this blog post presents perfectly good and logical arguments though, even if most people here might disagree.

I for one agree with many of his points. It's a shame I have to use a throwaway account to say that. If I used my primary, I'd be inundated with accusations of misogyny. There is a massive stigma associated with gender issues like this, where the opposing side is regarded as antiquated misogynists living in the 1700s no matter what they actually say.

Re: Weev: “Women in tech”, doxing, Kathy Sierra, and the koolaid

#20

Post by lhnz »

deadweight wrote: post #18
lhnz wrote: post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not an appropriate comment for HN. >> Be civil. [0] [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

You're cherry picking. The guideline, and I want to stress that it's a guideline and not a rule or EULA. >> Be civil. Don't say things you wouldn't say in a face to face conversation. When it comes to racist, sexist, hatemongers who derive pleasure from causing other people suffering, this is as civil as it gets. I also want to assure you; I would make the same comment in person.

I realised you might make the same comment face-to-face which is specifically why I chose to try to appeal to your civility.

If you're not civil in person or are act differently towards groups of people that look or believe differently from you then good luck to you but you're not a very good human being.

Post reply on HN