Interesting, I analyzed myself and patio11. any insight on the tech stack and how it was implemented?
It would be interesting to see the code.
Analyze Your HN Posts with Watson User Modeling
11–20 of 56 posts
Re: Analyze Your HN Posts with Watson User Modeling
#12Seems to be down for me: 404 Not Found: Requested route ('hn.mybluemix.net') does not exist.
Re: Analyze Your HN Posts with Watson User Modeling
#13Is there any insight as to how this works? I got an Openness rating of 97% and a Harmony rating of 100%, both of which I know are not true. (I also received a Love rating of 1% under my Needs, although that's pretty accurate.)
and using the sample Node project to show the results. I am still exploring it myself :p
Re: Analyze Your HN Posts with Watson User Modeling
#14Re: Analyze Your HN Posts with Watson User Modeling
#15Re: Analyze Your HN Posts with Watson User Modeling
#16Not sure what that means... but maybe this post is contributing to it?
Re: Analyze Your HN Posts with Watson User Modeling
#17Re: Analyze Your HN Posts with Watson User Modeling
#18Re: Analyze Your HN Posts with Watson User Modeling
#19This is very cool. Although I don't know how accurate this is, if calibrated and tuned to yield a certain degree of accuracy it will have a variety of use cases. For example -- When interviewing someone, being able to run their github username (if known of course) to analyze their commit messages, comments, discussions. Or even their hn, reddit, twitter user names (if the usernames are linked with their first names,…
You can read the words they wrote but you cannot perceive the tone they wrote it in....I dont think this is helpful and may dismiss candidates that are otherwise perfect except when Watson analyzes them.
Re: Analyze Your HN Posts with Watson User Modeling
#20paste it into http://watson-um-demo.mybluemix.net/demo
87% Openness, 5% Agreeableness, that's funny.