101–110 of 157 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> A lot of "rust xxx" searches would link to outdated articles or to stale links in the Rust official docs. Or to an old mirror of the official doc, http://web.mit.edu/rust-lang_v0.9 is the bane of my rustperience.
It doesn't help that there's a game called Rust out there!
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Does OCaml still doesn't compile 1.0 + 2.0 or has that changed? Small stuff like this really bother some people and they fly off to Pythonland never to be seen again.
> Does OCaml still doesn't compile 1.0 + 2.0 or has that changed? I'm not quite sure what you mean? In any case, the compilation speed isn't really an issue (especially since we're talking about Rust, which last time I used it wasn't exactly fast).
After several years of this routine, it has become very old. For God's sake, if your ex is so bad then just move out of her house already. Don't just keep eating the dinners she prepares and complaining about them and saying you'll move out. Actually move out and stop talking about her all the time. Yet another article about how you can't stand how she clips her nails is not helping anyone.
I rarely have to do anything as low-level as rust would demand. More often than not I find myself using Python, but I had the same feelings when I started looking into rust a few weeks ago. It was exciting seeing the full pattern-matching, especially. I have a desire to get some experience in the area, but the problem is what to make. Does anyone have any ideas for some smallish libraries that would benefit the commu…
I've been thinking about implementing fastcgi so that I could play with simple rust webapps. Haven't had time to start on it though, so if that sounds interesting you'd have at least one immediate user.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, it's just in this example. In idomatic rust you would write this probably: https://gist.github.com/mitsuhiko/1f37c1092bdf54ce4213 The `try!` macro unwraps the okay part of the expression and early returns the err part. The nice thing about the explicit results is that you will do the error handling. With Python you often do not know if an error might come.
Ok, much better. At the risk of looking more like a java try/catch, is it possible to wrap multiple statements in a single try! clause ? Or at least have some way of saying " if there's any error in this block of code, simply stop execution and forward it to the calling statement"
Disappointing how this author's hyper-criticism of Python is not applied equally to Rust, presumably because Rust is newer and this author has other bones to pick with Python. If Rust has a problem, he will sell that it is charming (e.g. "it makes you think", "you just need to think differently", "needs more love"). The glass will be full any day now! But if any new effort in Python is not absolutely perfect or just…
> he will sell that it's because Python is a horrible pile of shit because nobody listens to him
I'm not sure we're talking about the same Armin here...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Does OCaml still doesn't compile 1.0 + 2.0 or has that changed? I'm not quite sure what you mean? In any case, the compilation speed isn't really an issue (especially since we're talking about Rust, which last time I used it wasn't exactly fast).
He's probably referring to the fact that you have to use different arithmetic operators for int and float in OCaml, so it would have to be 1.0 +. 2.0
Easy cross-compilation, motherfucker! Do you have it?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It doesn't help that there's a game called Rust out there!
I feared that, but overall combined with programmatic context (e.g. iter, array or whatever) I've had the game come up very rarely.
I did learn something about metals, though, so there's that.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I feared that, but overall combined with programmatic context (e.g. iter, array or whatever) I've had the game come up very rarely.
It gets a bit annoying that a lot of Rust libraries are named something rust-themed. I was looking at which web framework I should use (between Nickel and Iron) and so searching "rust nickel vs iron" returned absolutely nothing of relevance. I did learn something about metals, though, so there's that.