Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nope, that's not something anything we did would cause. We're not adding HSTS (yet).
Strange, I went to bed last night and everything was working and it was just a plain HTTP site sitting behind Cloudflare. Then I get up this morning and I'm getting SSL errors, I'm not sure where to go from here then.
Universal SSL
51–60 of 250 posts
Re: Universal SSL
#52What prevents me from doing this MITM attack in (for example) a public wifi: I add a domain I don't own (example.com) to my cloudflare account. Then I point a hostname (www.example.com) to an IP address I own (1.2.3.4).
From what I understand, cloudflare now serves HTTPS for this domain through their proxies. I can easily find out the IP of one of those by querying the nameserver they assiged me by doing "dig www.example.com @gene.ns.cloudflare.com".
Now when I spoof DNS responses, I can return one of those IPs. The traffic will go to cloudflare. They have a signed certificate for that domain and the traffic gets forwarded to my IP (1.2.3.4).
Maybe I'm missing something, but I tried the http part of this and proxying seems to work before cloudflare comfirmed that the (in the example) example.com domains nameserver actually points to cloudflares nameservers.
Re: Universal SSL
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
Does cloudflare require A records or NS records to point to them before issuing the cert? I guess maybe that could work. I'm still a little skeptical about the whole no-interaction-required part. Is there no way this is open to abuse? Could a third party sign up to cloudflare for a domain they do not own and somehow spoof the checks? Maybe it's no different than regular automatic domain validation though. Hopefully t…
> Could a third party sign up to cloudflare for a domain they do not own and somehow spoof the checks? You need to point the your domain to CloudFlare nameserver. I don't think you can do that unless you actually control the domain.
Re: Universal SSL
#54Can I pin the certificate from PaaS providers for .herokuapp.com or .rhcloud.com to enable "Full SSL" (Strict) on CF?
Although the SSL support for custom domains is a paid feature for most PaaS providers, this won't be true now if this is possible.
Re: Universal SSL
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
Strange, I went to bed last night and everything was working and it was just a plain HTTP site sitting behind Cloudflare. Then I get up this morning and I'm getting SSL errors, I'm not sure where to go from here then.
Are you using the HTTPS Everywhere extension, by any chance?
Edit: formatting
Re: Universal SSL
#56Great initiative, minor drawbacks such as up to 20% of the traffic wouldn't apply due to their use of SNI: "Globally, more than 80% of requests come from modern browsers, and that percentage is growing quickly." EDIT: Mixed content on that page (within the embedded map at https://cloudflare.github.io/sni-visualization/ )
Re: Universal SSL
#57EDIT: Won't work: You need to verify that you own the domain by pointing your NS records to cloudflares nameservers. What prevents me from doing this MITM attack in (for example) a public wifi: I add a domain I don't own (example.com) to my cloudflare account. Then I point a hostname (www.example.com) to an IP address I own (1.2.3.4). From what I understand, cloudflare now serves HTTPS for this domain through their p…
Re: Universal SSL
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Could a third party sign up to cloudflare for a domain they do not own and somehow spoof the checks? You need to point the your domain to CloudFlare nameserver. I don't think you can do that unless you actually control the domain.
I guess you're right about that, but it still feels a bit weird that a third party can just allocate a private key and a valid certificate without the actual owner of the domain requesting it.
Re: Universal SSL
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, we partnered with multiple CAs that are trusted by virtually every browser.
Isn't provisioning certs without at least a simple human interaction from the domain holder against CA rules?
Re: Universal SSL
#60This is excellent news - one question though - what would a user on XP see when he accesses one of these sites?
Just tested using the WinXP+IE6 virtual machine from https://www.modern.ie/en-gb/virtualization-tools Tested against: https://www.buro9.com/ , which is my own domain running behind CloudFlare using their SSL cert (it's a Pro account - my free accounts have not yet been enabled with the free SSL). IE6 on WinXP accesses this without warning providing CloudFlare Apps are disabled. If CloudFlare Apps are enabled, then IE…