Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's a bit ad hominem, don't you think? I thought the author made good points regardless of his personal circumstances. [Disclaimer: Didn't downvote you]
The article makes makes broad sweeping claims (unsubstantiated, needless to say) about a generation (neurotic/narcissistic/wussy) with a linkbait title "generation wuss". The article isn't even clever or insightful. We've heard the horror of "participation trophies" a thousand times before. Yawn. In the article he also manages to make light of bullying. He puts cyber-bullying in scare quotes (as if it isn't a real th…
The fact that you're worried about his being unimpressed with modern non-problems like "cyber bullying" kind of proves the point of the article, whether or not you're a member of generation weak sauce.