Live data from Hacker News

Adobe Acquires Photo-Editing Platform Aviary

techcrunch.com

61–64 of 64 posts

Re: Adobe Acquires Photo-Editing Platform Aviary

#61

Surprising negativity in here, an observation to consider: HN tends to be biased regarding acquisitions. Some companies, like Google or Apple, are praised for sage decisions and invaluable acqui-hires. Others, like Yahoo and Adobe, get panned for similar moves as trying to eliminate competing products or otherwise flailing capital. As i see it, Adobe identified a group of devs uniquely qualified to bring domain knowl…

I think the negativity comes not from the fact that Adobe bought them, but that Aviary was the main, visible competition to Adobe. Google and Apple get panned all the time for acquisitions, what are you talking about? Did you not see the thread when Apple announced they were buying Beats? Or every other Google-acquisition thread about users bemoaning the possible shuttering of the purchased service? People aren't hat…

Not sure I believe Aviary was the main visible competition to Adobe.

As far as photo editing software goes, I've been a hobbyist and part time photographer for a while, and I'm not sure I've ever heard of Aviary. When people recommend alternatives to Photoshop, I hear about Pixelmator, GIMP, Paintshop Pro, and a few others, but I don't remember ever hearing of Aviary.

To me, it doesn't seem like Aviary competes with Adobe directly at all. They're probably eating into the market of people who apply a few filters and upload to Flickr, but not many of those people use LightRoom or PhotoShop anyway. Even then, it's small fries compared to the pro/hobbyist Photographer market, and those people aren't going to use a web based editor because of IP issues and the inconvenience of uploading gigabytes of RAW files.

Also remember Adobe is huge and has products for document editing and video editing and other stuff. It doesn't look like Aviary does anything in those areas.

Re: Adobe Acquires Photo-Editing Platform Aviary

#62
post #38

nice. I think it's just a question of time until someone makes a web based Photoshop killer again though. Wonder how much of Adobe's revenue is based on Photoshop (or inclusion of Photoshop in CC)

Is a web based photoshop something anyone needs? (I'm talking an app with comparable features, not a basic photo editor).

You don't need feature parity - even if it initially served the needs of 20-30% of Photoshop users, it would be a threat to Adobe.

The feasibility barrier and cost of building a web app with some of the feature set of Photoshop is getting lower and lower.

If the transfer speed is an issue, it could work on local files - most of the code could be client side.

Post reply on HN