Live data from Hacker News

Apple’s dangerous game

washingtonpost.com

111–113 of 113 posts

Re: Apple’s dangerous game

#111

> Because the victim isn’t alive to share his password, and the phone will have locked before the body was found, the government won’t be able to search the phone to find the messages. Apple’s policy will keep the police from finding the killer. That seems bad. The problem with this argument is that it applies to all secure encryption. The purpose of encryption is to keep people not authorized to access private data…

Everyone seems to be forgetting that encryption and data is not bound to a given country and their legal system or constitution or whatever.

My phone needs to be protected from all intruders, regardless of my own government, other governments, corporations, or single actors.

Re: Apple’s dangerous game

#112
post #104

For a moment I thought I was reading a Xinhua article.

This could be the reason why iPhone 6 has not been approved in China. With heavy smuggling they will get plenty. A lot of arguments assume the (American) government is decent, but iPhone is a global device. Let's hope Apple products have the same security all over the world.

Agreed. Everyone forgets that my phone has to be protected from everyone in the world.

Re: Apple’s dangerous game

#113
Let me see if I get this straight. If I design a front door that can't be broken down, which also comes with a lock that can't be picked, it's my responsibility to keep a duplicate of every key, just in case law enforcement should come by and want to get into someone's home?
Post reply on HN