‘Big Bang Signal’ Could All Be Dust
simonsfoundation.org
‘Big Bang Signal’ Could All Be Dust
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: ‘Big Bang Signal’ Could All Be Dust
#2Perhaps this should be "Big Bang Gravitational Wave Signal" could all be dust.
From the headline, I was expecting something more shocking about cosmic microwave background radiation[1] generally. That would be THE Big Bang signal in my book.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discovery_of_cosmic_microwave_b...
Re: ‘Big Bang Signal’ Could All Be Dust
#3Having spent my previous career studying the effects of interstellar dust (though not in this wavelength range), it's amazing how often I would be the buzz kill by arguing that something that someone saw actually probably could be explained by dust. It has major effects on the radiation we receive and its effects are sensitive to the exact details of how it's distributed and what it's composed of.
Re: ‘Big Bang Signal’ Could All Be Dust
#4Perhaps this should be "Big Bang Gravitational Wave Signal" could all be dust. From the headline, I was expecting something more shocking about cosmic microwave background radiation[1] generally. That would be THE Big Bang signal in my book. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discovery_of_cosmic_microwave_b...
I was thinking the same thing :))
Re: ‘Big Bang Signal’ Could All Be Dust
#5I like that this is funded by a mathematician turned hedge fund billionaire. :-)
Re: ‘Big Bang Signal’ Could All Be Dust
#6To the sycophants who ejaculated their "Isn't science amazing?" jizz all over this and every other website (without troubling themselves to read the paper) when the news was first pumped out by the ignorant and self-serving media: suck it.
It's OK, Sheldon. You can come home now.
Re: ‘Big Bang Signal’ Could All Be Dust
#7This is the Planck analysis on the arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.5738