Norway the Slow Way
nytimes.com
Norway the Slow Way
1–10 of 34 posts
Re: Norway the Slow Way
#2Re: Norway the Slow Way
#3leaving for bergen myself in a couple of hours: can't wait
Re: Norway the Slow Way
#4i think the presentation (lay out and semi interactiin) of the article is very well done! running smooth on 1920 * 1200 leaving for bergen myself in a couple of hours: can't wait
Re: Norway the Slow Way
#5It's an admirable attempt at telling a story and I appreciate the journalism. Perhaps I'm ADD, but I just don't have the attention span to get engrossed in this kind of format and follow every word through to the end.
Re: Norway the Slow Way
#6i think the presentation (lay out and semi interactiin) of the article is very well done! running smooth on 1920 * 1200 leaving for bergen myself in a couple of hours: can't wait
It's a big improvement over previous attempts at this sort of multi-format presentation. I'll give NYT a lot of credit for pushing things in this direction, even if some of their early efforts fell a bit short. (Some previous articles in this style were too cute for their own good, and wound up hard to read).
i'd love to see other (news) publishers to walk this path as the options are there, they just need some creativity
Re: Norway the Slow Way
#7The BBC have been experimenting with these kind of long-form "rich media" articles too: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/special/2014/newsspec_8701/index.h... It's an admirable attempt at telling a story and I appreciate the journalism. Perhaps I'm ADD, but I just don't have the attention span to get engrossed in this kind of format and follow every word through to the end.
Re: Norway the Slow Way
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's a big improvement over previous attempts at this sort of multi-format presentation. I'll give NYT a lot of credit for pushing things in this direction, even if some of their early efforts fell a bit short. (Some previous articles in this style were too cute for their own good, and wound up hard to read).
agreed; they appear one of the few who embrace the new possibilities in publishing and actually try to come up with something different and are not afraid to make some mistakes in the process… i'd love to see other (news) publishers to walk this path as the options are there, they just need some creativity
Apparently NYT had a big come-to-Jesus meeting earlier this year, where they discussed the challenges their business model is facing, and resolved to do something about it. Who's to say whether this stuff will move the needle for them. But at least they're doing interesting things, and I support them.
NYT can't necessarily see the future (when it comes to journalism, nobody can). But it recognizes that its future lies in high-quality articles, and it's investing in new definitions of quality. Many of its competitors are moving in the opposite direction, adopting practices from content farms and clickbait sites. In the long run, NYT will need to do a lot more to rethink its economics. But for now, its investment in quality is probably a good move.
Re: Norway the Slow Way
#9Re: Norway the Slow Way
#10Fly into Tromsø, spend a couple of days there, then rent a car and head west. Gorgeous scenery, twenty-four-hour sunlight, great hiking, and mild weather - we loved it.