Earlier quoted context omitted.
So on 90% of phones when someone opens "the web" using the browser installed on their device, they are using an unsupported browser. How would they know this?
Only 20% of mobile web traffic comes from ASOP browser.
Major Android Bug Is a Privacy Disaster (CVE-2014-6041)
41–50 of 232 posts
Re: Major Android Bug Is a Privacy Disaster (CVE-2014-6041)
#42So the bug is only for a browser that isn't supported by Google? No surprise that it hasn't been patched. If security is such a big deal to a user they should use a browser that is supported by a strong development team. Firefox and Opera Mobile work fine on low end phones.
"a browser that isn't supported by Google" But still a browser that was created by Google and was bundled with the OS until 12 months ago, never mind how long it takes OEMs to roll it out. Android https://developer.android.com/about/dashboards/index.html?ut... Just because Google decided not to support it any more doesn't mean they shouldn't . Pointing out Firefox and Opera is all very well, but this is the default b…
Re: Major Android Bug Is a Privacy Disaster (CVE-2014-6041)
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
So on 90% of phones when someone opens "the web" using the browser installed on their device, they are using an unsupported browser. How would they know this?
Only 20% of mobile web traffic comes from ASOP browser.
http://gs.statcounter.com/#mobile_browser-ww-monthly-201308-...
Re: Major Android Bug Is a Privacy Disaster (CVE-2014-6041)
#44If you aren't familiar with SOP, this is about the worst "stupid web vuln" that can happen. SOP is the glue that kind of almost makes the web secure. The attack DOES work if X-Frame-Options is enabled (thanks joev. The msfmodule says so clearly). ALL sites with or without XFrameOptions can be loaded in an iframe, and sent to a bad guy. If you would like to test on your device/browser, you can on ejj.io/SOP.php . If y…
Actually X-Frame-Options does not save you here. There is a BYPASS_XFO datastore option in the module that turns this into a one-click exploit. This allows the attack to work against sites with the XFO header.
Re: Major Android Bug Is a Privacy Disaster (CVE-2014-6041)
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
Very few people explore other browsers? Alt browsers are often the first app that people download. Chrome is included in gapps.
Who, engineers? Certainly not my wife or anyone else I have ever met who isn't technical.
Re: Major Android Bug Is a Privacy Disaster (CVE-2014-6041)
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's because most web traffic comes from iOS. AOSP Browser represents about half of the Android traffic.
Well, not everywhere. Here in Brazil, Androids have the (by a huge margin) biggest share of the market and of the mobile traffic.
Obviously things aren't the same everywhere...
Re: Major Android Bug Is a Privacy Disaster (CVE-2014-6041)
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
So on 90% of phones when someone opens "the web" using the browser installed on their device, they are using an unsupported browser. How would they know this?
Only 20% of mobile web traffic comes from ASOP browser.
Re: Major Android Bug Is a Privacy Disaster (CVE-2014-6041)
#48It's this sort of thing that puts me off Android as a platform. Even my mother got sold a 2.2 handset recently (Samsung Galaxy Ace) that hasn't been patched for the best part of 3 years. You never know when you're going to end up with a lemon on your hands. Big jump to this conclusion but I'm more inclined to trust Microsoft at the moment as they have a better reputation for lifetime (unlike Android), have a very pub…
Re: Major Android Bug Is a Privacy Disaster (CVE-2014-6041)
#49>While the AOSP has "been killed off" by Google, it... I do not follow android closely, but this refers to the browser only, right?
> While the AOSP browser has "been killed off"...
Re: Major Android Bug Is a Privacy Disaster (CVE-2014-6041)
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
Very few people explore other browsers? Alt browsers are often the first app that people download. Chrome is included in gapps.
Who, engineers? Certainly not my wife or anyone else I have ever met who isn't technical.