Does anyone know if they recorded this as well? I've heard the Q&A session was also quite good.
Rich Hickey's Keynote: A deconstruction of object-oriented time [pdf]
11–20 of 46 posts
Re: Rich Hickey's Keynote: A deconstruction of object-oriented time [pdf]
#12I found this fascinating. Does anyone have any knowledge of any other programming languages/environments that focus on time in a way comparable to that suggested in the presentation?
Re: Rich Hickey's Keynote: A deconstruction of object-oriented time [pdf]
#13Re: Rich Hickey's Keynote: A deconstruction of object-oriented time [pdf]
#14Re: Rich Hickey's Keynote: A deconstruction of object-oriented time [pdf]
#15Brilliant use of ANW's "Process and Reality" (considered by many as a meta-physical text) providing philosophical mappings to Clojure's approach of state, time etc.
Re: Rich Hickey's Keynote: A deconstruction of object-oriented time [pdf]
#16I found this fascinating. Does anyone have any knowledge of any other programming languages/environments that focus on time in a way comparable to that suggested in the presentation?
Re: Rich Hickey's Keynote: A deconstruction of object-oriented time [pdf]
#17I just wish all the good things were a little bit more memory efficient. Maybe we're getting there eventually...
"All of the Clojure collections are immutable and persistent. In particular, the Clojure collections support efficient creation of 'modified' versions, by utilizing structural sharing, and make all of their performance bound guarantees for persistent use." http://clojure.org/data_structures
What this does to cache locality, I do not know.
Re: Rich Hickey's Keynote: A deconstruction of object-oriented time [pdf]
#18I think the key to Rich's ideas is to realise them on non-volatile storage. This could revolutionise filesystems and databases.
Re: Rich Hickey's Keynote: A deconstruction of object-oriented time [pdf]
#19It needs some deep thinking and slow and careful reading to understand all the implications (most students rush through these sections imo), but it provides a good foundation to understand what Rich's talking about.