Apple – Live – September 2014 Special Event
81–90 of 397 posts
Re: Apple – Live – September 2014 Special Event
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
Check the comments, someone already solved this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8290769
Well, still, for a company that tries to make everything "simple and beautiful", why don't their video streams just work everywhere out of the box? That is the question.
The better answer is probably: "They simply don't care". No ifs and buts. Probably making it a bit exclusive and hard to get to only adheres to their marketing philosophy.
Re: Apple – Live – September 2014 Special Event
#83Guess: The building outside is actually a stage where Dre will perform.
Re: Apple – Live – September 2014 Special Event
#84Guess: The building outside is actually a stage where Dre will perform.
Re: Apple – Live – September 2014 Special Event
#85How can I watch this on windows if I don't have Quicktime installed?
Re: Apple – Live – September 2014 Special Event
#86Apple.com/ has been redirecting to apple.com/live for about ~20 hours now. They're very confident about what's about to be presented.
You know what I wonder? An alternative explanation to a very confident Apple is just that they changed their attitude about all this, thinking there is not really much of a difference between them providing a countdown or others doing it (before the last Keynote this countdown webpage got pretty huge), between them providing a liveblog or others doing it (there are always many liveblogs with often crappy photos, so w…
Re: Apple – Live – September 2014 Special Event
#87I'm getting older, so maybe my desires don't match up with the majority of tech people's anymore, but does anyone really want an iWatch (or whatever it ends up being called)? I am just not sold on the usefulness of such a thing.
Re: Apple – Live – September 2014 Special Event
#88Who wants to see the mac mini revived? ;)
Re: Apple – Live – September 2014 Special Event
#89Re: Apple – Live – September 2014 Special Event
#90Earlier quoted context omitted.
They've been using a '301 MOVED PERMANENTLY' redirect, meaning they are extra serious about this.
Or lazy about their redirecting. 301's are supported by pretty much every browser, indexer and wget/curl whereas 302's sometimes fail on those. Its also pretty easy to reissue another 301 from /live to com/
I'm pretty sure compatibility isn't the reason of that choice.