11–20 of 100 posts
Compiling to Javascript is nothing short of a mental illness. The perversions that the terrible design of the web has driven people to are simply breathtaking...
OT but I really hate how these sorts of slide decks break the back button. emscripten is pretty cool technology, the paper presenting the tech ( http://davideglintine-new.googlecode.com/hg/docs/paper.pdf ) is actually a really easy read. Cool stuff. I hope it doesn't become a norm to try and write "normal" websites in C++, though things like games do seem to be easier
Compiling to Javascript is nothing short of a mental illness. The perversions that the terrible design of the web has driven people to are simply breathtaking...
Compiling to Javascript is nothing short of a mental illness. The perversions that the terrible design of the web has driven people to are simply breathtaking...
Compiling to Javascript is nothing short of a mental illness. The perversions that the terrible design of the web has driven people to are simply breathtaking...
Compiling to Javascript is nothing short of a mental illness. The perversions that the terrible design of the web has driven people to are simply breathtaking...
Compiling to asm.js isn't the same thing as compiling to JS. asm.js is just a funny-serialized bytecode. Someday they can trade it out for a sane serialization and hardly anything will blink.
Compiler -> Bytecode -> Normal JS/ASM.js is the long term strategy for asm support in JSIL, since it will depend on currently-experimental asm features and using asm+polyfills on all browsers would have obscenely bad performance characteristics.
Compiling to Javascript is nothing short of a mental illness. The perversions that the terrible design of the web has driven people to are simply breathtaking...