My main concern is security. When Twitter stores your payment information it will be easy to buy something with a single click. But I've seen way too many Twitter hacking going on when I look at friends' timelines. If tweets like 'How I lost 100 lbs in 3 months! Click > bit.ly/youwillbehacked' can be posted without too much effort, these same hackers could buy stuff for free by just hacking into your Twitter account.
Twitter offers 2 factor authentication for account logins (SMS a code every time you login).
Testing a way for you to make purchases on Twitter
81–90 of 122 posts
Re: Testing a way for you to make purchases on Twitter
#82Re: Testing a way for you to make purchases on Twitter
#83There are exactly zero times I wished I could buy something from a Tweet with a button. Given that limited observation of buyer behavior, and knowing full well Twitter wishes to make profit, I'm assuming these buttons will be forced into my public stream somewhere, somehow. Some people on here think these buttons will be placed there by Twitter via ads, but I have another idea: Provide a micropayment channel program…
as well at turn the social network into a cesspool.
Re: Testing a way for you to make purchases on Twitter
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can always add a link to the tweet for more details.
And then you can buy from the page with the details. Forcing you to go back to the twit to buy would be a bad idea.
Re: Testing a way for you to make purchases on Twitter
#85Re: Testing a way for you to make purchases on Twitter
#86
Re: Testing a way for you to make purchases on Twitter
#87Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thing is, Twitter should be a protocol. It clearly fills an existing need (I see it as very similar to email in that regard, just filling a different need – people want to chat publicly with each other and in a very informal way inform the public about things), but it doesn’t really make sense as a service that wants to make money. Twitter should be just like email, not this one monopoly controlling everything. It’s…
I'm not sure if it's even possible to build a twitter-like system with distributed servers in the vein of e-mail. It's possible for e-mail because it's a one-way system. Twitter has the concept of following a user, and that user's tweets appear to me. It's a 2-way system that needs to constantly be kept in sync. Even if it's possible to do, it won't be easy, with loads of extra technical challenges that SMTP doesn't…
Re: Testing a way for you to make purchases on Twitter
#88Earlier quoted context omitted.
Twitter isn't a protocol. If it was, there'd be Twitter (the protocol) based services everywhere, and it'd be open and federated. Twitter is a service. Services need money. It's a simple as that.
Thing is, Twitter should be a protocol. It clearly fills an existing need (I see it as very similar to email in that regard, just filling a different need – people want to chat publicly with each other and in a very informal way inform the public about things), but it doesn’t really make sense as a service that wants to make money. Twitter should be just like email, not this one monopoly controlling everything. It’s…
Still centralized, still controlled by one company, but it's a step in the right direction. It's a shame they're struggling to survive against worse services.
Re: Testing a way for you to make purchases on Twitter
#89There are exactly zero times I wished I could buy something from a Tweet with a button. Given that limited observation of buyer behavior, and knowing full well Twitter wishes to make profit, I'm assuming these buttons will be forced into my public stream somewhere, somehow. Some people on here think these buttons will be placed there by Twitter via ads, but I have another idea: Provide a micropayment channel program…