Live data from Hacker News

Moto 360 review

theverge.com

61–70 of 75 posts

Re: Moto 360 review

#61
post #57
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My pebble lasts between 7 and 10 days. You must be getting a lot of notifications; do you enable accelerometer-triggered backlight? Do you listen to music often (with the music controls) ?

I get a pretty good number of notifications per day, and my pebble only lasts about 3-4 days.

A lot of it depends on the watchface. One that updates every second (like a ticker) is going to drain a lot faster than one that only displays minutes.

Re: Moto 360 review

#62

Am I the only one who felt like he refused to acknowledge this might be a bad product? The Verge has been gushing over this watch for months now and when they finally get it they have the same faults with it as other Android Wear devices. Yet for some reason because it's round and stylish (I beg to differ) it's immediately a better product?

It's odd that they talk about other smart watch competitors except for the open sourced one.

Re: Moto 360 review

#63

Am I the only one who felt like he refused to acknowledge this might be a bad product? The Verge has been gushing over this watch for months now and when they finally get it they have the same faults with it as other Android Wear devices. Yet for some reason because it's round and stylish (I beg to differ) it's immediately a better product?

It wasn't just because it was round and stylish. It was because for the first time the reviewer believed that it felt like an actual watch. That is: discreet and unobtrusive. Those come from a device "feeling" different than another. Not just because of specs on a page.

Re: Moto 360 review

#64

Am I the only one who felt like he refused to acknowledge this might be a bad product? The Verge has been gushing over this watch for months now and when they finally get it they have the same faults with it as other Android Wear devices. Yet for some reason because it's round and stylish (I beg to differ) it's immediately a better product?

It wasn't just because it was round and stylish. It was because for the first time the reviewer believed that it felt like an actual watch. That is: discreet and unobtrusive. Those come from a device "feeling" different than another. Not just because of specs on a page.

That's enough to warrant a 2 point bump over the other Android Wear devices? They gave the G Watch and Gear a 6.8, and a 8.1 to the Moto 360, yet they have very similar flaws. The focus, as evident by their wrap up, is all about design.

Re: Moto 360 review

#65

Am I the only one who felt like he refused to acknowledge this might be a bad product? The Verge has been gushing over this watch for months now and when they finally get it they have the same faults with it as other Android Wear devices. Yet for some reason because it's round and stylish (I beg to differ) it's immediately a better product?

The Verge has always been a Google sounding board. Anything Google tends to get very high reviews.

Re: Moto 360 review

#66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It wasn't just because it was round and stylish. It was because for the first time the reviewer believed that it felt like an actual watch. That is: discreet and unobtrusive. Those come from a device "feeling" different than another. Not just because of specs on a page.

That's enough to warrant a 2 point bump over the other Android Wear devices? They gave the G Watch and Gear a 6.8, and a 8.1 to the Moto 360, yet they have very similar flaws. The focus, as evident by their wrap up, is all about design.

You do understand that watches are for a significant amount of people a fashion accessory ? Design is at least if not more important than functionality.

And as someone who cares about how they look design is the only reason I pick which watch to buy.

Re: Moto 360 review

#67

For me smart watches currently seem like tablets before the iPad. There's something not quite right about them but it's hard to pinpoint. I'm hoping that Apple is going to come along and fix that next week. Being their first new product category in 4 years I'm guessing than they've spent a lot longer working on it that LG/Motorola have. Of course I could be completely wrong.

> smart watches currently seem like tablets before the iPad. There's something not quite right about them but it's hard to pinpoint. I'm hoping that Apple is going to come along and fix that next week.

Paste an Apple logo sticker on it if that makes you feel better...

Re: Moto 360 review

#68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's enough to warrant a 2 point bump over the other Android Wear devices? They gave the G Watch and Gear a 6.8, and a 8.1 to the Moto 360, yet they have very similar flaws. The focus, as evident by their wrap up, is all about design.

You do understand that watches are for a significant amount of people a fashion accessory ? Design is at least if not more important than functionality. And as someone who cares about how they look design is the only reason I pick which watch to buy.

I completely get that, but we're talking about something that is $250 and supposed to bring a benefit to your life. If it's offering no additional benefit beyond the other devices other than looking nice, does it warrant such high praise? I personally don't think so. You're letting a poor product slide just because of it looking nice.

Re: Moto 360 review

#69
post #58

So, here's something I've been wondering about smart watches, maybe someone here can answer. It seems like the big dealbreaker for these is battery life. But a cheap watch with quartz timekeeping and digital lcd display can last a year or more on a single small battery. Would it be possible to sandwich two lcd displays into the face of the watch, one that is cheap and one that is high-res full-color? Always display t…

It also depends what features do you expect from the watch. I have a Pebble. It does everything I want on a "smart" watch, and the battery lasts from 7 to 10 days. Which is obviously worst than a year, but it's good enough that it doesn't become a PITA for me.

I don't have one but I remember with my last smartphone (years ago), the battery lasted at least 3 days and I was able to make it last more than a week without any issue. I found out that if I didn't charge it everyday, I would often forget to do it. I had a cable to charge it at work because I forgot too often at first. I started charging it everyday and when I bought the Galaxy Nexus, I had no issue with the awful battery life. I would still like if it lasted more than 2 days, just in case.

If the reviews on the Moto 360 aren't too bad and the battery last at least 2 days, I will probably buy it.

Post reply on HN