Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly but I see nothing wrong with this. If universities are willing to accept students not based on merit but on a touching story, then they had it coming. People who admit one to these universities in general are not alumni of that school, did not go through the same experience and are not experts in the subject one wants to study. It is ludicrous to expect them to differentiate good candidates from bad ones. Als…
Exactly but I see nothing wrong with this. I'm sure those other applicants who were turned down in favor of these are fine with it as well
I Ghostwrite Chinese Students' Ivy League Admissions Essays
31–40 of 232 posts
Re: I Ghostwrite Chinese Students' Ivy League Admissions Essays
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
> they'll do better in life than the ones that didn't make it but not as good as the ones that were honest and made it If this is true, then less-than-deserving children will have successfully used their parents' wealth to artificially improve their station in life. Which means that our higher education system is helping to perpetuate class divides (even though it claims to be greatly interested in not doing so).
Of course it does. Look at the price of tuition. That perpetuates class divides more than any other factor.
Re: I Ghostwrite Chinese Students' Ivy League Admissions Essays
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
> they'll do better in life than the ones that didn't make it but not as good as the ones that were honest and made it If this is true, then less-than-deserving children will have successfully used their parents' wealth to artificially improve their station in life. Which means that our higher education system is helping to perpetuate class divides (even though it claims to be greatly interested in not doing so).
Legacy admissions (which is alive and well at my alma mater) definitely helps to perpetuate this as well.
Re: I Ghostwrite Chinese Students' Ivy League Admissions Essays
#34I felt pretty guilty doing the work at first, but I quickly realized that most of the assignments were so banal that I don't think the clients missed out on much learning value by outsourcing it. Why are college courses giving "major" assignments that can reasonably be completed in 5-10 hours by a smart person with no training in the field? If a college degree just means you banged out a bunch of garbage essays, as it does for many people based on the assignments I saw contracted out, should we really be outraged that some people are not doing the work themselves?
I would argue that the real scandal is not that some people are paying for help, but that many degree programs demand so little in terms of knowledge and thought that they can be easily gamed in this way. I would like to see fluffy degree programs ended, so that legitimate work in the humanities can continue without anyone wasting time and resources shuffling average Joes through the pipeline to middle class office jobs.
The most surprising discovery for me was that it seemed like after foreign language students the heaviest users of the service were education majors. No joke. I never figured out if the noticeably heavy use by education majors was a selection bias caused by the way the service was advertising itself, a sign of especially low ethics among education majors, or an indication that there might be a higher incidence of lifestyle factors (e.g. going to school while working full time) that made it difficult for them to crank out all the BS assignments required of them.
It's also interesting to me that the author of this piece seems to be an independent contractor whose business increased as she became known. Generally, I would expect ghostwriters to want to keep a low profile which makes it hard to be independent. I certainly didn't want anyone knowing how I was paying the bills when I was in it. And unless you are charging top-end rates, the overhead of marketing yourself and picking up envelopes of cash at Starbucks is probably an inefficient use of time. Both of these factors mean that a lot of people end up working for agencies that do the work of finding clients and managing payments, and also provide double blinding. So the writer never knows the identity of the client, and vice versa. It's a pretty good system overall.
Re: I Ghostwrite Chinese Students' Ivy League Admissions Essays
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly but I see nothing wrong with this. I'm sure those other applicants who were turned down in favor of these are fine with it as well
u must be a communist, right?
Re: I Ghostwrite Chinese Students' Ivy League Admissions Essays
#36Re: I Ghostwrite Chinese Students' Ivy League Admissions Essays
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly but I see nothing wrong with this. I'm sure those other applicants who were turned down in favor of these are fine with it as well
u must be a communist, right?
Re: I Ghostwrite Chinese Students' Ivy League Admissions Essays
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
Of course it does. Look at the price of tuition. That perpetuates class divides more than any other factor.
The top universities (such as those in the Ivy League) typically give full financial aid to any admitted student who comes from a middle or lower class socioeconomic background. The "tuition problem" primarily exists at mediocre private universities (as well as those public universities that have significantly hiked tuition in recent years) which depend on squeezing every last penny from their students.
Re: I Ghostwrite Chinese Students' Ivy League Admissions Essays
#39Really interesting piece. In my post-college lull, I was once in a major financial bind and ended up doing a brief stint as an academic ghostwriter. I wrote term papers, not admission essays, for a ghostwriting service over a period of about 2 months. The work was easy and the money was good. I felt pretty guilty doing the work at first, but I quickly realized that most of the assignments were so banal that I don't t…
Re: I Ghostwrite Chinese Students' Ivy League Admissions Essays
#40First of all - wow, what a talented writer. No wonder her clients have done so well. Forgery of college admissions essays is rampant not just in China but also in the US (and I suspect in many other places), but actually the problem is really much worse than that. With the boom of the "college consultants" industry, professionals are essentially "forging" entire high school careers on behalf of their clients - tellin…
I don't really get this perspective. If colleges are going to base admissions on amorphous things like what clubs someone joined, or what organizations they volunteered for, why shouldn't a student hire a consultant to navigate those waters? Is the student who hires a consultant to tell them what classes to take, or what clubs to join, or what organizations to volunteer for, and then follows through with those, less deserving of a spot than someone that happens to randomly fall upon the right combination of activities? Or, more to the point, has an uncle who went to an Ivy-league school that can give them the same advice?
If anything, admissions consultants level the playing field. Who else is going to tell a bright midwestern student that Ivy-league schools don't respect locally popular clubs like Future Farmers of America? Who else is going to tell a bright lower-income student that they should spend their summers "volunteering" in Africa instead of working all summer to make some spending money? The families with Ivy-league alums already know what boxes to check.