Live data from Hacker News

A Financial Model Comparing Car Ownership with UberX in Los Angeles

gohe.ro

21–30 of 115 posts

Re: A Financial Model Comparing Car Ownership with UberX in Los Angeles

#21
Geez, $12,744 per year?

I've had my current car since 2002, which I bought new for about $14,000 (including interest, which was low because I paid the car off as quickly as I possibly could, short circuiting most of the interest payments).

I go through the exercise of the total lifetime cost of my car, gas, insurance, maintenace, all told every year or two. And it's somewhere around $.30-.40 per mile or about $1 cheaper than Uber.

I recently took it in for its 130,000 mile comprehensive check over and it ended with my mechanic offering me $5,000 for the car (I didn't sell it).

It's expected that I should be able to get another 100,000 miles out of this car easily. And at my current rate of driving, that'll be an easy 10 years.

I'm pretty sure I'm going to keep this car unless it needs major mechanical repairs, and so far it hasn't.

All this means is that my cost per mile keeps going down. I'm at well under Right now I probably drive under 5,000 miles per year (telecommuting is amazing) and even these astonishingly hopeful UberX costs (60 mph commute times everywhere in cities bah!) are almost twice what it costs for me to have my own car I do whatever I want with. More realistically, these commute times could easily be tripled in most cities, making UberX even less of an option.

The only thing this answers is "will taking Uber on the occasional 25 minute or less trip cost less than owning a $50,000 MSRP luxury mid-sized sedan?" then the answer is obviously yes.

Honestly, if your starting point is a Lexus, you're not really all that concerned with your transport costs to start with.

edit I don't even think the math is right.

Let's assume his 24.2 mile commute in 25 minutes (haha!). Uber charges $1.10 + $.21 per minute or $1.31 per mile at 60mph. So let's just make the numbers easier, 25 mile commute in 25 minutes, so the commute ~ $1.31 * 25 = $32.75. But I have to go home again in the evening. * 2 = $65.50 per day. * 250 work days in the year = $16,375.

He's off by about $10,000 even assuming these ridiculous commute times.

Re: A Financial Model Comparing Car Ownership with UberX in Los Angeles

#22
Uber is great, but the biggest cost is that you need to pay for the services of someone driving for you. I live in Montreal and regularly use http://communauto.com/ They have two services, 1) for ~$2,50/hour + $0,10/km, where you need to make a reservation, you get the car from one specific parking lot and have to return it there. It's useful only if you plan in advance, if you haven't reserved a car for the weekend by Wednesday forget about it.

The 2) service though you just swipe your metro card on the panel for an auto-mobile car parked somewhere, drive for $0,30/minute and leave the car anywhere (in some very big zones in the cities). It's exactly like https://www.car2go.com/ except their auto-mobile vehicles (hybrids and electrics) have backseat, so we can go around with kids (whereas you can't with a Smart).

I commute by bicycle to work, so we use this only on the weekends. It takes around $7 to go from our place to the center, while public transport would be $5, so it's really great for the convenience and speed.

By far it really beats owning a car in Montreal in cost and convenience. Parking space is limited and very expensive ($8 for 2 hours in city center). If you have a car you have also to keep changing parking even if you don't use it because there are very few buildings with garage and they clean the streets at least once or twice a week for the entire year. I've been car-free for over 20 years, it's a huge relief to not have to worry about taxes, maintenance, robbery, etc etc that comes with the responsibility of owning a car.

Come self-driving cars, we might have only some very few people that will keep owning their own vehicles due to some nostalgia feeling.

Re: A Financial Model Comparing Car Ownership with UberX in Los Angeles

#23
post #14
post #5

"About two years ago I sold my Lexus GS 300 and replaced it with a sleek single-speed Pure Fix commuter bike" This brought a vision of someone trying to descend from capitol hill here in seattle on a fixie (something I saw the last week) - a fixie, while still stupid is at least workable in LA (though I'd still never own one, I prefer gears), it still seems wholly impractical for seattle.

I see single-speed bikers as the luddites of cycling. I live in a relatively flat city, Dublin, but I am still constantly shifting gears. I think a lot of people don't understand how good gears really are. In a similar way, there are a lot of people cycling mountain bikes around the city, and I didn't appreciate how much better actual road bikes are while I still had my hybrid. And for non-cyclists: 15 mph (25 kmph)…

neo-luddites perhaps, when I was an active cyclist a bit more than a decade ago the fixie was an unknown thing. There were single speed bikes then - the well known beach cruiser - it was a single speed, yes, but it also could idle along without peddling and had a rear drum brake - I can see a place for that kind of thing - no one has been able to explain to me how a direct drive fixed gear bicycle is better than even that option.

Re: A Financial Model Comparing Car Ownership with UberX in Los Angeles

#24
post #3

I live in Los Angeles, I have sold my car and now take UberX everywhere. I have a number of reasons for this: 1) I am not a great driver. I learned to drive in a rural area where the dynamics of sharing the road were simply different. It's not fun for me to drive in LA. 2) Parking in this town is a challenge. 3) I telecommute. 4) When I go on a long-drive vacation, I simply rent a car. For me and my family, in our ca…

LA is also a very bipolar town, car-wise. If you have a 5+ mile commute, it's going to be way worse than the same distance in most US cities, because of the traffic. But the flip side is that there is far more density to the LA suburbs than most anywhere else in the country—it's hard to even use the same word to describe suburban LA (7K/sqmile average for the whole urbanized area per Wikipedia, with parts significantly higher) as, say, suburban DFW, where the population density is half that for Dallas proper alone, let alone all the suburbs.

So if you live near where you work, you can bike or walk or bus and there's a decent chance you'll be in walking or biking distance of some shops and restaurants as well. And then the occasional Uber or cab for longer trips (or just bumming off of friends who have cars) is extremely practical.

But if you don't telecommute, being able to live near where you work is something that's a lot easier for those without a family. And then those Ubers would add up fast!

(The other thing I've anecdotally noticed since moving to LA, is that the willingness to sit in traffic for an hour each way to commute seems way higher in LA natives than in transplants—and the reverse is true of the willingness to pay the premium to live close to work and avoid that.)

Re: A Financial Model Comparing Car Ownership with UberX in Los Angeles

#25
Should've run the numbers with Car2Go.

Uber in LA costs 67 cents per minute (avg. speed in LA is 26MPH). Car2Go in LA costs 25-41 cents per minute (41 per minute with a max of $15/hr).

Unsurprisingly, one of the more expensive parts about Uber is having a human being driving the car for you. Car2Go (if you don't mind driving janky little SmartCars) trims that cost now.

Re: A Financial Model Comparing Car Ownership with UberX in Los Angeles

#26
post #20
post #13

"In fact, he believes one day all the Uber cars on the road may be driving themselves." What piece of "cars driving themselves" does Uber have? Uber has an app. Google has self driving cars and they can also build an app. So he is basically describing Google's future, not Uber's.

Once self-driving cars are available, Uber would be a major company deploying them (assuming Uber is still around and similarly positioned). They could either buy their own cars, or somehow allow private "drivers" to deploy their cars on the Uber network.

That is certainly the thesis behind the wild valuation of Uber - but so far Uber hasn't really shown the ability to lock customers into its taxi network. Whoever develops the self driving cars can build the Uber app/network part of the system much more easily than Uber will be able to build the self driving car part of the system.

Re: A Financial Model Comparing Car Ownership with UberX in Los Angeles

#27

Should've run the numbers with Car2Go. Uber in LA costs 67 cents per minute (avg. speed in LA is 26MPH). Car2Go in LA costs 25-41 cents per minute (41 per minute with a max of $15/hr). Unsurprisingly, one of the more expensive parts about Uber is having a human being driving the car for you. Car2Go (if you don't mind driving janky little SmartCars) trims that cost now.

You can't work during the commute in that case, however - the author referred to this as an opportunity cost of driving. Working in tech one would imagine in many cases work would be much more productive than driving.

Re: A Financial Model Comparing Car Ownership with UberX in Los Angeles

#28
post #4

He makes average assumptions about car ownership but then makes optimistic assumptions about UberX. Like no surge pricing, productivity and wait times. The biggest thing is of course Uber is available in a few cities. Places like SF and Manhattan it might be convenient since everything is nearby but in LA and Silicon Valley everything is spread out.

The other biggest thing: uber is a one company, and a startup. They may be forced to radically change their business models, their service may turn to shit, and they might even go up in smoke overnight.

And if that happens, there are plenty of car dealers ready to take your money. It only takes 2-3 days to buy a car, people do it all the time.

Re: A Financial Model Comparing Car Ownership with UberX in Los Angeles

#29
post #13

"In fact, he believes one day all the Uber cars on the road may be driving themselves." What piece of "cars driving themselves" does Uber have? Uber has an app. Google has self driving cars and they can also build an app. So he is basically describing Google's future, not Uber's.

They have a contract with Google: http://techcrunch.com/2013/08/25/uberauto/

Re: A Financial Model Comparing Car Ownership with UberX in Los Angeles

#30
I grew up in LA - Uber is a practical car replacement option if you stay largely within your neighborhood or city.

This isn't how most people in the basin live however - many (if not most) live at least 10, but usually closer to 20-25 miles from work, and rely on the freeway to get them to work - 50+ miles a day even in an UberX is not practical from a cost basis - not when you consider the large number of people who don't go out and buy a large luxury car, but instead pick up a beater economy car from craigslist, or something that they bought new a decade or more prior.

The comparison however does work when you consider someone who commutes under 10 miles each way a day, and buys a new car every 3-5 years.

Post reply on HN