Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yea, we need a .dbignore, or something of the sort.
You mean like this? http://konolige.com/dbignore/
Introducing a more powerful Dropbox Pro
41–50 of 151 posts
Re: Introducing a more powerful Dropbox Pro
#42I've been waiting on this for a long time. Now Dropbox might actually be a viable, affordable off-site backup solution.
Dropbox isn't ideal for backup at all. Look into Crashplan. Client-side encryption, unlimited versioning, never deletes files, and only $6/month for truly unlimited backup.
Re: Introducing a more powerful Dropbox Pro
#43lol who cares?
I do care about dropbox, it's the only cloud system that works well on linux systems . It used to be overpriced but now the pricing is good. Also Google Drive is terrible on Windows if like me you have a lot of files. One drive is limited to 2GB of file size. I have yet to find a great alternative to it.
Re: Introducing a more powerful Dropbox Pro
#44Re: Introducing a more powerful Dropbox Pro
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
I didn't downvote, but it wasn't a productive comment -- it was just snarky and condescending. I don't think this is front-page worthy of HN, sure, but anytime someone at Google/Dropbox/Apple does so much as pass gas, people around here get excited.
Helping Dropbox grow is arguably the single greatest achievement of YC to date. I think in that light it makes sense that news about Dropbox gets on the front page of news.ycombinator.com.
Re: Introducing a more powerful Dropbox Pro
#46It is unclear whether the packrat add-on for unlimited versioning is still available for Dropbox Pro.
Re: Introducing a more powerful Dropbox Pro
#47Re: Introducing a more powerful Dropbox Pro
#48It does one thing only: deduplication.
All the other stuff needed for remote, incremental backups, e.g., moving files back and forth over a network, can be done with other open source tools. I think I have a pretty good command of moving files around with open source software... I do not need a third party to help me via an obfuscated blob of Python and who knows what else.
I like having control over my backups versus trusting it all to some closed-source, third party, "all-in-one" application.
In my mind having control and transparency will always be more powerful than handing over my data deduplication and backup to a third party, such as "Dropbox".
But I imagine there are few others who would agree. Forgive me for not loving Dropbox. Maybe some day I will see the light.
Re: Introducing a more powerful Dropbox Pro
#49It is disappointing that Dropbox still does not offer any options for secure storage. Personally, you might be fine with unencrypted stories but at least for companies in Europe, having (all) your data with an American cloud provider without local encryption on your side is simply not a legal option … Dropbox is a great service, however, it would be even greater if I could use Dropbox for all my data and not only sel…
Re: Introducing a more powerful Dropbox Pro
#50It is unclear whether the packrat add-on for unlimited versioning is still available for Dropbox Pro.