MIT study finds that human subjects prefer when robots give the orders
21–30 of 36 posts
Re: MIT study finds that human subjects prefer when robots give the orders
#22We let robots give order all the time. The traffic light is one example.
The research is related to artificial intelligence, not pure automation.
Re: MIT study finds that human subjects prefer when robots give the orders
#23I, for one, welcome our new robot overlords...
Re: MIT study finds that human subjects prefer when robots give the orders
#24Robots also don't play favorites or office politics. If there is a more efficent/better way, it will do it. Even better when it is allowed to re-calculate with new parameters.
The issue with this is the efficient way is not always the better way. If you keep assigning the same menial and crappy task to a worker because they get it done quick, yay efficiency! Except if you're asking the same worker to clean the bathrooms three times a day every day, it's not going to take long before he goes "fuck this, I'm going to work somewhere else!" The robot will assign the next most efficient person,…
Retention is something you could optimize for in the long term.
Reliability for covering shifts is a number too.
I think you're right on a small scale, humans can make generally reasonable judgement calls with little data.
If you think about the future though, if a big corp can optimize middle management robots with 100,000 employees worth of data, they probably will.
Re: MIT study finds that human subjects prefer when robots give the orders
#25immediately thought of manna - http://www.amazon.com/Manna-Two-Visions-Humanitys-Future-ebo... . (FWIW, don't think it has aged too well)
Re: MIT study finds that human subjects prefer when robots give the orders
#26Robots also don't play favorites or office politics. If there is a more efficent/better way, it will do it. Even better when it is allowed to re-calculate with new parameters.
I'd invert that. You can't complain, whine, or plot social solutions in response to getting assigned tasks by a robot. There's a lower mental load in response to getting a task, since you don't have to worry about how your response to task assignment gets interpreted by your boss.
(Pardon if my language seems salty; "asshole" and "shit" are actually popular technical terms when dealing with the domain of bosses.)
Re: MIT study finds that human subjects prefer when robots give the orders
#27Robots also don't play favorites or office politics. If there is a more efficent/better way, it will do it. Even better when it is allowed to re-calculate with new parameters.
The issue with this is the efficient way is not always the better way. If you keep assigning the same menial and crappy task to a worker because they get it done quick, yay efficiency! Except if you're asking the same worker to clean the bathrooms three times a day every day, it's not going to take long before he goes "fuck this, I'm going to work somewhere else!" The robot will assign the next most efficient person,…
If previous Lean / Six Sigma studies are correct, this feedback loop will lead to improved employee morale as they become the drivers of decision making and less likely to feel disenfranchised.
A layer of management can be removed and it is mismanagement that generates the most workplace animosity, as you say yourself.
Re: MIT study finds that human subjects prefer when robots give the orders
#28Robots also don't play favorites or office politics. If there is a more efficent/better way, it will do it. Even better when it is allowed to re-calculate with new parameters.
The issue with this is the efficient way is not always the better way. If you keep assigning the same menial and crappy task to a worker because they get it done quick, yay efficiency! Except if you're asking the same worker to clean the bathrooms three times a day every day, it's not going to take long before he goes "fuck this, I'm going to work somewhere else!" The robot will assign the next most efficient person,…
Naturally there's going to be more variance in employee performance on some tasks rather than others. For example being a cashier during a quiet time will have less variance than toilet cleaning. A workaround might be to pay a bonus for good performance on high variance tasks.