The author of Calibre claims: In my opinion, calibre’s graphic interface is damn good [1] I don't think the author is going to make any strides towards improving/changing the UI [1] http://features.en.softonic.com/interview-kovid-goyal-creato...
I agree with him. It's usable, and easy to understand. It doesn't follow the fads of our time, and thats fine. I struggle to understand why such a superficial demand is at the top of hacker news. Asking every useful software project to hire designers so it fits the Apple Guidelines (yes I'm exaggerating) seems both unproductive and more likely to drive the programming endeavor further out of the apartments of inventi…
Announcing Calibre 2.0
51–60 of 102 posts
Re: Announcing Calibre 2.0
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
Toxic maintainer. Kovid Goyal is known to be abrasive. I'm looking for good examples. But maybe I've just seen the other end of the arguments and he's okay? I'm guessing the best bits are hidden here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/calibre/+bug/ Like eg this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/calibre/+bug/853934
I remember reporting a bug, a few years ago, though I can't find it now. It was about the weird glitches in the green icons next to the search bar in the toolbar. These: https://www.dropbox.com/s/9umwphlisjy4uzd/Screenshot%202014-... I included screenshots at the time. I got brushed off with a "this doesn't happen for me, it's probably your system being messed up" and my bug closed as invalid. It's still there, acros…
Re: Announcing Calibre 2.0
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm guessing that's a very hard problem, but I'd love to hear otherwise. If you go the standard route: write in latex then pdflatex, you have no information in the pdf as to what those symbols are, right? So this is pretty close to mathematical ocr, with all of the weird symbols that math alone uses and the various meanings of different lengths of underbar or overbar in the article. Am I wrong? Is there more informat…
I think that the solution is much more simple. Print formula > Convert formula to image (screencap) > Paste image
Re: Announcing Calibre 2.0
#54Re: Announcing Calibre 2.0
#55The author of Calibre claims: In my opinion, calibre’s graphic interface is damn good [1] I don't think the author is going to make any strides towards improving/changing the UI [1] http://features.en.softonic.com/interview-kovid-goyal-creato...
I agree with him. It's usable, and easy to understand. It doesn't follow the fads of our time, and thats fine. I struggle to understand why such a superficial demand is at the top of hacker news. Asking every useful software project to hire designers so it fits the Apple Guidelines (yes I'm exaggerating) seems both unproductive and more likely to drive the programming endeavor further out of the apartments of inventi…
The interface is an unmitigated disaster from tip to toe. There's too much going on. It doesn't need to get hit with the iBooks stick to make it better; it just needs someone with half a clue to delete half the buttons, tabs, modals, windows, panes, lists, checkboxes, and other crap.
Put another way: Eclipse is not the program you want to base your design on.
Re: Announcing Calibre 2.0
#56I don't suppose he's backtracked on his awful position on auto-updates?
I'm definitely not a fan of every launch of Calibre showing me a prompt to update, but I'm also not sold on apps that upgrade without my express consent.
Re: Announcing Calibre 2.0
#57I don't suppose he's backtracked on his awful position on auto-updates?
http://chocolatey.org/packages/calibre
I'm sure OS X has something similar, but I wouldn't know where to find it.
Re: Announcing Calibre 2.0
#58I'm sure calibre 2.0 is a great technical feat, and kudos for all the work put into this product, but judging by the screenshot the user interface is equally clunky as in 1.0. This software does mostly everything I need it for to convert ebooks... but can you, the authors, please improve the UI?
I was so excited to see this headline specifically because I hoped they would be doing a UI overhaul. Unfortunately, that just seems to not be the case or even on the horizon. I'd definitely consider dedicating time with it, but I've heard nothing but bad things about trying to work with the maintainers of the code.
Re: Announcing Calibre 2.0
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
I remember reporting a bug, a few years ago, though I can't find it now. It was about the weird glitches in the green icons next to the search bar in the toolbar. These: https://www.dropbox.com/s/9umwphlisjy4uzd/Screenshot%202014-... I included screenshots at the time. I got brushed off with a "this doesn't happen for me, it's probably your system being messed up" and my bug closed as invalid. It's still there, acros…
Yeah, happens for me too but I never noticed until now. I guess I just always thought that this was the way it was designed to look. The UI is more than a little bit jumbled/ugly.
But then... they don't line up. If it was intentional, I'd expect them to be on the same level.
Re: Announcing Calibre 2.0
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think that the solution is much more simple. Print formula > Convert formula to image (screencap) > Paste image
the whole point is to have vector math, not raster, particularly to well support zooming in and out on small devices
In EPUB3 readers with full support one can translate the paint primitives via pdf.js into JS, too.