Live data from Hacker News

Why do event sites suck?

jtoy.net

51–55 of 55 posts

Re: Why do event sites suck?

#51
post #15

On a somewhat related note, if you make a website for a specific event on the top of the first page, clearly visible, you should have: * The date and time of the event * The event location * Price * Any other relevant information (dress-code, what to bring, etc) or at least a prominent link to said information

I totally agree that a lot of sites fail to get the most important info front-and-center.

I recently started building http://minivite.com to address that problem.

Re: Why do event sites suck?

#52
BuzzInTown.com is an example of digital traction in a highly analog ecosys/geo. In combo w/ say CitySense (iPhone & B'berry app) that implicitly offers interest-based segmentation along spatio-temporal lines and an intelligent calendar app like LuckyCal, we may be on our way to an elegant, albeit cobbled-together solution.

Re: Why do event sites suck?

#53
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

upcoming? Wasn't that the startup. yahoo bought it. ( http://upcoming.yahoo.com/ ) I think the problem is structural - the money flows from gig promoters, hence the interface is not built for the user's desires.

upcoming was bought by yahoo in 2005. I totally agree that the sites are built for the promoters and not the users. The biggest problem I see how can this be built for the users and make money at the same time, any ideas?

Nope, but if there is an answer, it may look like the difference between expertsexchange and stackoverflow (the later is a good example of building for the users).

Other commenters raise interesting points as to why this problem is harder than others - events have so many niches, there's a new set of them for each new set of users. And unlike on stackoverflow, in a month all of that data has lost almost all of its value and you need new data.

Re: Why do event sites suck?

#54
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes neilk, awesome. Let me also add... I am not convinced that very many people care about discovering new events in the first place, at least not events that don't have an immediate impact on one's social status. People learn about most events from their friends or their existing communities. This should not seem strange because people become friends with one another (or join communities) through having aligned inte…

"""I am not convinced that very many people care about discovering new events in the first place, at least not events that don't have an immediate impact on one's social status.""" My definition of an event is: A social gathering of my friends, or friends of friends. I don't care about random trivia nights, but I might check them out if my immediate friends are going to them. I believe that an "event community" is a…

* Going to the same event as a perfect stranger is not a strong enough context for socialization*

People who have just moved to a new place do a lot of that, soon they get a new peer group. Finding the right events is easier than it once was with online tools, but still not trivial.

Re: Why do event sites suck?

#55
post #10

Songkick.com is an events site, for live music events around the world, and they're awesome. They've even got a plugin for iTunes to recommend you gigs based on what you listen to. (I no longer work there, but their product looks better than ever.)

yet its data frequently seems to be wrong, for anyone looking at a particular city who knows the venues.

So if they can't get it right, for a limited scope of live music events, it is clearly as tough to get right as others say it is.

Post reply on HN