Live data from Hacker News

Lime Text: Open Source Sublime Text clone

limetext.org

101–110 of 251 posts

Re: Lime Text: Open Source Sublime Text clone

#101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't make 60 bucks an hour (not even 45 euros).. Much sad :(

You may be confusing your salary with what your boss charges clients. Or, it may simply be that you are from somewhere where the economy is different.

I know the distinction between the two ;-)

While my boss charges something like EUR100 an hour, I make less than 25% of that (after taxes).

O.t.o.h.: The salary is quite competitive around here (41k EUR a year, 40hrs/wk, 25 days off)

Re: Lime Text: Open Source Sublime Text clone

#102
post #100
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I completely agree with what you say. Sublime is awesome and I don't mind paying money for closed-source software. What I do mind is, that the development seems to have stopped, and being closed-source nobody can move it forward but the original maintainer. It once again brings attention to the most important "bus factor" [0] [0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bus_factor

I'm pretty curious about what new features you are looking for in Sublime. I spend more time in Sublime Text than pretty much any other application. I understand the idea that "development may have stopped", but there are not any glaring bugs, sublime text 3 is super fast, and there is a huge community building sublime plugins. The editor was built in such a way where it allows the entire community to keep moving it…

Both Emacs and Vim are updated regularly:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Emacs#Release_history

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vim_%28text_editor%29#Release_h...

In between major releases they have tons and tons of bug fixes (Vim probably has hundreds per release).

Editors can suffer a lot from code rot since they have to integrate with a lot of things. An Open Source version could be quite interesting from Sublime's community point of view. I don't know about the developer's income while this happens, though.

Re: Lime Text: Open Source Sublime Text clone

#103
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, I use that, but I'd also love to buy just for the sake of it. But 60 is a lot. I guess he just targets developer who are constantly using an editor instead, increasing the price and making that bet. The pop up message must be quite unnerving for heavy users.

$60 for a tool that you'd probably use every day? Well worth it in my opinion.

When people complain about the cost of iPhone and Android apps ("What! This is going to cost me a buck?!") $60 to many people today must seem like an absolute fortune.

Re: Lime Text: Open Source Sublime Text clone

#104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ok that's interesting. The following features are also crucial to me: * Tree view * Split window with synchronized views when showing the same file * Regex search over file or selection, results can be turned into multicursors (!) * Regex search over multiple files or directories * Multicursors at each line for a selection * Auto-update of views when file underneath changes (editor should ask what to do in case of ed…

Interesting, I guess it is just an editing preference. Multiple cursors i associate with mouse use (I know it isn't the same but I bet most people use the mouse with them). I consider touching the mouse dangerous for myself and for productivity. > Tree View This i fully understand (and exisits in emacs) but I think not necessary either for my workflow. A treeview does already exist in a format called folders and file…

multicursors are useful for repeated patterns of text which need simultaneous /editing/. The regex-replace-all is not good enough apparently. Mostly HTML or siblings I would guess (I really hope not code!!). This is mostly /visual/ editing. I have used them and I dont think they are the bees' knees. I dont use mouse much while editing.

Re: Lime Text: Open Source Sublime Text clone

#105
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The funny thing being that the impetus for a lot of people moving to Sublime in the first place was that happening to TextMate 1.

I'm pretty happy with TextMate 2 at this point - pretty regular updates, mature eco system, continuous improvement and its open source.

We need split window/panes and TM2 would be perfect for me.

Re: Lime Text: Open Source Sublime Text clone

#106
post #102
post #100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm pretty curious about what new features you are looking for in Sublime. I spend more time in Sublime Text than pretty much any other application. I understand the idea that "development may have stopped", but there are not any glaring bugs, sublime text 3 is super fast, and there is a huge community building sublime plugins. The editor was built in such a way where it allows the entire community to keep moving it…

Both Emacs and Vim are updated regularly: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Emacs#Release_history http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vim_%28text_editor%29#Release_h... In between major releases they have tons and tons of bug fixes (Vim probably has hundreds per release). Editors can suffer a lot from code rot since they have to integrate with a lot of things. An Open Source version could be quite interesting from Sublime's…

Looking at the links you posted - vim is updated once every 3-4 years, emacs - once a year. Looking at sublime text release log (http://www.sublimetext.com/blog/) it's been updated much more often than emacs and vim combined.

Re: Lime Text: Open Source Sublime Text clone

#107
post #102
post #100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm pretty curious about what new features you are looking for in Sublime. I spend more time in Sublime Text than pretty much any other application. I understand the idea that "development may have stopped", but there are not any glaring bugs, sublime text 3 is super fast, and there is a huge community building sublime plugins. The editor was built in such a way where it allows the entire community to keep moving it…

Both Emacs and Vim are updated regularly: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Emacs#Release_history http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vim_%28text_editor%29#Release_h... In between major releases they have tons and tons of bug fixes (Vim probably has hundreds per release). Editors can suffer a lot from code rot since they have to integrate with a lot of things. An Open Source version could be quite interesting from Sublime's…

While it is nice that they're both updated regularly, I'm not sure that hundreds of bug fixes per release is actually comforting. (I say this as a happy Vim user :)

Re: Lime Text: Open Source Sublime Text clone

#109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A dom object for every character probably makes it forever an uphill battle.

Indeed. Atom will never be fast enough. Because of the "cool" underlying tech chosen.

Given 640K is enough for anyone?

Re: Lime Text: Open Source Sublime Text clone

#110
I wish they wouldn't attach themselves to the sublime brand. It's not theirs, and it's pretty shady to ride another project's coattails when their intent is essentially to cannibalize it by being sublime-but-free. You can discuss the merits of open source and paying for tools all you want, but basically their goal is to put a man out of business who's made something that a lot of people love, because he has the gall to charge $60. Anyway. I'm all for competition, but do it under your own banner with your own ideas.

Also, I think it's weird that the fact that it's made in Go is part of the pitch. I mean, unless I'm contributing... I don't care. You could write it in brainfuck if it does the job.

Post reply on HN