Did this really need saying? Is there ascandal going on here somewhere?
A Reminder To Investors
21–30 of 290 posts
Re: A Reminder To Investors
#22Re: A Reminder To Investors
#23Re: A Reminder To Investors
#24Re: A Reminder To Investors
#25[deleted]
Re: A Reminder To Investors
#26I perfectly understand intolerance towards sexual harassment but I wonder what qualifies as "inappropriate romantic behavior" in this context. You can not ask a founder "on a date"? What's if is the other way around? EDIT: of course this is coming from a nobody. I'm just curious.
Re: A Reminder To Investors
#27I perfectly understand intolerance towards sexual harassment but I wonder what qualifies as "inappropriate romantic behavior" in this context. You can not ask a founder "on a date"? What's if is the other way around? EDIT: of course this is coming from a nobody. I'm just curious.
Correct: if your interactions with a founder are cabined by professional settings --- demo days, funding pitches, going for coffee to talk about their company --- romantic overtures are inappropriate. Similarly: if you're in process, at any stage, with a company, overtures to their founders are inappropriate.
Re: A Reminder To Investors
#28Re: A Reminder To Investors
#29I perfectly understand intolerance towards sexual harassment but I wonder what qualifies as "inappropriate romantic behavior" in this context. You can not ask a founder "on a date"? What's if is the other way around? EDIT: of course this is coming from a nobody. I'm just curious.
You wait until after demo day and the conflict of interest has cleared, before asking someone on a date. It's not that tough.
It's maybe unfortunate it has to be this way, but investors should not hit on founders, full stop.
For those who didn't see this when it was making its way around, these are the two articles that have come up recently:
http://www.wired.com/2014/07/gender-gap/
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffbercovici/2014/08/07/what-it...
Re: A Reminder To Investors
#30Did it ever happened any investor to YC startups tried to take advantage of the founders before, or this post is just an act of prevention?