First-Person Hyper-lapse Videos
71–80 of 184 posts
Re: First-Person Hyper-lapse Videos
#72Great results but looks expensive. I wonder how many minutes of processing per minute of video.
From the paper listed on the page it looks like it takes about 305 hours to process a 10 minute video. The vast majority of that is during the "source selection" phase which takes 1 minute per frame of video.
Re: First-Person Hyper-lapse Videos
#73I walked around Boston once with some friends for 7 hours. When I remember it I see it as the hyperlapse, not moment for moment or sped up. Super interesting work.
Re: First-Person Hyper-lapse Videos
#74Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's certainly way better than the source video, but it's nothing close to what would come from a steadycam or dolly. You couldn't use this finished product in any kind of real production.
That depends heavily on your definition of "real production," and probably quickly devolves to no true Scotsman. I absolutely think this could be used in productions I would consider real, particularly documentary/travel/reality programs and sports.
Re: First-Person Hyper-lapse Videos
#75Re: First-Person Hyper-lapse Videos
#76Re: First-Person Hyper-lapse Videos
#77Re: First-Person Hyper-lapse Videos
#78Bloody amazing! Fantastic work! Release it. Release it soon. This is something that everyone would want. I see they have listed a Windows app coming. Is that Windows desktop app?
If I were them I would offer this as a web service: upload your video and have it converted for $1.
They said they'll offer it as a windows app, and I imagine it's for very corporate reasons.
Re: First-Person Hyper-lapse Videos
#79Re: First-Person Hyper-lapse Videos
#80I don't understand how computers figure out 3D from single camera video without parallax. How do they do that?
I recall those childhood days when we could not explain why moon appeared to come along as our car moved. :-) Those differences in apparent speed betrays something about the distance of the object/point under consideration.