Live data from Hacker News

Missile Guidance Systems

datagenetics.com

11–13 of 13 posts

Re: Missile Guidance Systems

#11
So on a rather non-lethal note, I built a pair of robots for a predator/prey sorts of experiments[1]. I had written code that used an R/C servo to locate a beacon, and then navigate to the beacon. It worked quite well, but when I put the beacon on the 'prey' robot it rarely worked at all. The challenge was the added complexity of no fixed reference point. I found a great book[2] which described a number of approaches to the problem and ended up using a pretty simple pursuit model. The trick for me was tracking both the bearing to the target and the bearing on loss of acquisition (so keeping track of "how" it left the field of view) I ran out of CPU and memory before it got too interesting but now I should revisit it as I've got 10x the CPU and memory to play with.

[1] One thing about robots is once you get them doing the easy stuff you want them to do harder stuff.

[2] http://books.google.com/books?id=Ag9TAAAAMAAJ

Re: Missile Guidance Systems

#12

While I acknowledge the author's opening statement, I still need to add a few details and refinements. :P In addition to what the author describes for LOS guidance, there are a couple other, related guidance mechanisms. One is known as semi-active radar guidance. This scheme, used in early radar-guided air-to-air missiles, has the launcher illuminate the target with a special fire control waveform. The missile has a…

Thanks for commenting (I'm the post author here).

I agree, it's a fascinating subject. I wanted to give a high level perspective and there were some liberties taken.

Post reply on HN