Live data from Hacker News

Mississipi is richer than Europe

mjperry.blogspot.com

51–52 of 52 posts

Re: Mississipi is richer than Europe

#51
post #29
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Italy's roads aren't that bad, actually (at least in the north). The problem is that they are covered with Italian drivers, and there are an awful lot of them: 60 million in an area a bit smaller than California. (Well, 60 million inhabitants - not all of them drive, but more drive than they ought to)

I wasn't trying to imply that Italy's roads were bad, just pointing out that US roads are unusually excellent . I picked Italy instead of Germany to avoid a pointless message board argument comparing Germany's often-excellent roads to Mississipi's.

People (and by that I mean Americans, sorry) seem to think Germany's roads are an exception. While this may have been true 20 or 30 years ago, in reality they're pretty much the same as or even a little worse than the rest of Europe. An exception might be the EU10, but they're catching up really fast.

Also, 20-lane motorways through the centre of a city is not a sign of excellency but rather that of poor planning.

Re: Mississipi is richer than Europe

#52
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Greenhouse gas emissions are not smog, and they're not air pollution in the normal sense of hurting people in their immediate vicinity. Greenhouse gas emissions contribute to global climate change, and the per capita GHG emissions of Mississippians are more than twice as high as the per capita GHG emissions of Europeans, regardless of the local air quality. Also, that was only one part of my comment. The other part i…

Yes, but the discussion was about whether Mississippi pays higher social costs than Europe. This has nothing to do with how much C02 Mississippi itself releases.

GHG emissions are an economic externality so vast that they're driving the planet's climate into crisis. Sooner or later those costs will be internalized one way or another. In the meantime, the cost of living in places like Mississippi that have extremely high per capita emissions benefits from a huge artificial subsidy that isn't being taken into account.
Post reply on HN