Live data from Hacker News

Which is better, Adblock or Adblock Plus?

palant.de

41–50 of 192 posts

Re: Which is better, Adblock or Adblock Plus?

#41
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I highly recommends HTTPS Switchboard or uBlock (same author). They are both faster and better than any Adblocker out there.

This looks like something worth playing with. How does this overlay with other tools like Ghostery? Are there any other tools worth mentioning?

In my experience, you wont need other privacy/ad-blocking tools. See here:

https://github.com/gorhill/httpswitchboard/wiki/How-does-HTT...

Re: Which is better, Adblock or Adblock Plus?

#42
post #32
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ya, I'd rather not give them money if their policy is to allow some ads if given $.

ABP's free. Getting on the whitelist is also free for "all small- and medium websites and blogs". https://adblockplus.org/en/acceptable-ads-agreements If you're ok with blocking ads, I don't see how allowing companies to pay a fee to have them unblocked hurts anyone. If it feels icky then maybe ad blocking is icky.

Yes, but whitelist is supposed to be for unobtrusive and not tracking ads. Then Google pays and… it is on whitelist! I cannot help but think that by using ABP instead of Adblock Edge you are giving ABP developers means to blackmail advertising companies. And not getting the protection you want in the first place.

Re: Which is better, Adblock or Adblock Plus?

#43
post #40

What I've wanted for some time, and it seems hard for me to find, is a good ad blocker that only works on blacklists. I don't mind ads on some sites as long as they're non-intrusive. Once they start getting in the way of the content though, I want to blacklist the site. Everything I've seen so far (although I haven't put a LOT of time into searching) only works on all sites by default and you have to whitelist the on…

This is the feature I'm missing from the Firefox Adblock Plus. One of the Adblocks for Chrome has this (can't remember which one) and it was great. I only blocked ads on the site I wanted to. Hopefully they'll make it for Firefox.

Re: Which is better, Adblock or Adblock Plus?

#45
A great solution is to run DNSMASQ on your local network, and configure it to block unwanted domains. That way it works on any connected device automatically, with no plugins or browser overhead.

There are plenty of guides - google it!

Re: Which is better, Adblock or Adblock Plus?

#46
THE POINT OF THE AD BLOCKER IS TO BLOCK ADS. ITS NOT UP FOR DEBATE. THE AUTHORS OF BOTH ARE BEING DISINGENUOUS.

its like supplying weapons to both sides of a war.

and guys cut the "internet needs ads" crap. i have a couple of businesses and apps and make a profit because people value them and value the support i provide for them and recommend them. kind of like why hackernews works -- its legit recommendations, not some a$$w$%^ paying money for their article to float to the top...

Re: Which is better, Adblock or Adblock Plus?

#49
post #31

If people prefer more extreme solutions: I eventually moved to Conkeror (think Firefox, but with Emacs bindings and Emacs-like extension via javascript; I know cue the egg throwing). I was looking at other browsers to replace Firefox, as I got sick of it, and I picked Conkeror. Conkeror has a neat little feature called content-policy. I can block kinds of crap per session or site (Flash, JS, Fonts, Object tags, Image…

DNS based Adblock, profile and Malware block. Make your Internet Faster and Safer with free http://BA.net/adblock
Post reply on HN