Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Words for Chrome – Smarter, safer web comments

words4chrome.com

1–10 of 57 posts

Re: Show HN: Words for Chrome – Smarter, safer web comments

#2
This is my 4-year, off-and-on passion project. All suggestions and feedback are appreciated. I'd especially welcome product/feature-based ideas about how to overcome the enormous cold-start hurdle.

Note: Re-posted with permission from Dan. Last week's post got dinged by a semi-false-positive algorithmic penalty after only a few minutes.

Re: Show HN: Words for Chrome – Smarter, safer web comments

#3

This is my 4-year, off-and-on passion project. All suggestions and feedback are appreciated. I'd especially welcome product/feature-based ideas about how to overcome the enormous cold-start hurdle. Note: Re-posted with permission from Dan. Last week's post got dinged by a semi-false-positive algorithmic penalty after only a few minutes.

Would you consider supporting OpenAnnotation or similar efforts from W3C?

Cold-start: convince a site with an existing audience to promote it.

Re: Show HN: Words for Chrome – Smarter, safer web comments

#4

This is my 4-year, off-and-on passion project. All suggestions and feedback are appreciated. I'd especially welcome product/feature-based ideas about how to overcome the enormous cold-start hurdle. Note: Re-posted with permission from Dan. Last week's post got dinged by a semi-false-positive algorithmic penalty after only a few minutes.

Would you consider supporting OpenAnnotation or similar efforts from W3C? Cold-start: convince a site with an existing audience to promote it.

First I've heard of OpenAnnotation. I'll look into it. Thanks.

As far as overcoming the cold start, I'm looking not so much for marketing ideas, but for product or feature enhancements that would be valuable to users immediately, without a huge number of other users.

Google search - useful for 1 user Facebook - theoretically useful for a handful of friends Twitter - useful for a slightly larger network

Words doesn't have friend/follower mechanisms -- it's just not the nature of the product. The intention is for users to interact with each other as they happen upon the same content. It's a dynamically-changing social graph. Unfortunately, this means the critical mass of users is definitely north of 100k, probably higher.

Re: Show HN: Words for Chrome – Smarter, safer web comments

#5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Would you consider supporting OpenAnnotation or similar efforts from W3C? Cold-start: convince a site with an existing audience to promote it.

First I've heard of OpenAnnotation. I'll look into it. Thanks. As far as overcoming the cold start, I'm looking not so much for marketing ideas, but for product or feature enhancements that would be valuable to users immediately, without a huge number of other users. Google search - useful for 1 user Facebook - theoretically useful for a handful of friends Twitter - useful for a slightly larger network Words doesn't…

It wasn't a marketing suggestion. If an existing community (even a small one with hundreds of users) promotes the plugin, you will get feedback about requirements and feature enhancements. This is a necessary precursor to finding 100K users. Even Facebook started in a limited school environment.

These "second screen" or "third voice" apps require people to be (a) trained on the tool, (b) have a common set of target objects that they want to talk about. You could start off simple by looking for a small community of people who:

(a) use chrome

(b) regularly visit multiple (5-10) sites related to their primary site

(c) currently talk about the secondary sites using their primary site

(d) see value in having their existing conversations appear in-context on the secondary sites

The plugin may have business applications for proof-reading.

Re: Show HN: Words for Chrome – Smarter, safer web comments

#6
Cool, I've thought about something like this for ages, but lazy always prevails. The only thing I don't really agree with is:

"Let’s face it. One major problem with embedded web comments is that everyone is invited to participate. They’re too open.

The WORDS community, on the other hand, is necessarily comprised of people who (a) use Chrome and (b) desire a better commenting experience. Why else would they have installed WORDS?"

That's true for now, but any system that gains any amount of steam will inevitably pick up trolls, flamers, and generally idiotic people. You can't stop it from happening. And I don't know that anyone has ever found a good solution for it. In fact, the whole 'Top Comments' and up/down-voting thing most third-party comment widgets employ is literally to combat that problem, in the hopes that garbage falls to the bottom. It obviously doesn't work perfectly and I do still agree on the whole with your assertion of it being overall detrimental to good discussion.

Anyway, I'm guess I'm mostly curious if you have plans for the future of if/when the extension gets more popular and you do start finding discussions bogged down by trolls/spammers/etc and what ways you'd try and combat such things when you have 100k+ users or whatever.

Re: Show HN: Words for Chrome – Smarter, safer web comments

#7
Good luck getting traction. The web is littered with the corpses of "comment on any website" apps. The problem is that there are too many websites and too many incompatible "comment on any website" standards for any one of them to emerge as a clear leader.

P.S. You list non-tracking as a differentiating feature, but how do you silence speech you don't like without tracking users?

Re: Show HN: Words for Chrome – Smarter, safer web comments

#9

Cool, I've thought about something like this for ages, but lazy always prevails. The only thing I don't really agree with is: "Let’s face it. One major problem with embedded web comments is that everyone is invited to participate. They’re too open. The WORDS community, on the other hand, is necessarily comprised of people who (a) use Chrome and (b) desire a better commenting experience. Why else would they have insta…

I've thought about something like this for ages also. But lazy always prevails.

Now, do you know something about a Google product from some years ago that did something like this, but was discontinued?

Re: Show HN: Words for Chrome – Smarter, safer web comments

#10

Cool, I've thought about something like this for ages, but lazy always prevails. The only thing I don't really agree with is: "Let’s face it. One major problem with embedded web comments is that everyone is invited to participate. They’re too open. The WORDS community, on the other hand, is necessarily comprised of people who (a) use Chrome and (b) desire a better commenting experience. Why else would they have insta…

Thanks for the thoughtful feedback.

One of the problems with other commenting systems is what I call The Clean Slate Effect. If a troll is sucky on site A, then goes to site B, they start over with a clean slate and can continue being sucky.

Words benefits from the fact that it's web-Wide. If a user is terrible, they get silenced everywhere.

You're totally right (as was Paul Graham when he spoke about how Hacker News is evolving) that these sorts of systems get worse the larger they get. And that getting too big too fast is definitely a bad thing. Just look at Digg.

So I definitely anticipate badness down the road, but feel the code foundation is there to deal with it as it comes.

Post reply on HN