Live data from Hacker News

Repeated six-second bursts of exercise 'can transform health'

bbc.com

11–20 of 38 posts

Re: Repeated six-second bursts of exercise 'can transform health'

#11
post #2

I hope this article gets some attention. I have felt a lot better from high intensity training. Much much better than half hour long slogs on the treadmill. I really believe it is the best for general cardiovascular fitness.

The idea is that your heart and lungs (probably specifically heart in my case) are getting a workout. In this case we aren't concerned with abs, legs, biceps or any other muscles except the ones involved with cardio. We want to isolate and push these in intervals the same way a body builder might his triceps with isolation and reps.

(The lungs and heart are muscles too... sometimes people forget this).

My version goes something like this.... I jog on the treadmill for 5 or 6 minutes as a warm up. Just a slow jog, nothing too strenuous. Then, I take a break for about a minute while walking around.

Then, for three (or four depending on day and mood) iterations I do the following.... get on the treadmill and increase the speed until I can just barely keep up. I try to stay at plateau speed as long as I can... from start until exhaustion usually around 1.5- 2 minutes. Then, I take a break for around 3 minutes. I test my heart rate until it drops back to a bit above baseline... that's how I know it's time for next cycle.

I finish with another slow warm-down jog for 5 or 6 minutes.

The whole workout takes around 20 minutes and it really has improved my well being and general health. Sex life is better and I have in general much more energy. I attribute this to a stronger heart. For the record, I'm not a stranger to exercise. I ran track in high school, and have jogged and worked out periodically throughout my life... sometimes rather intensely. I'm 43 years old. I just haven't found a system that improves general feeling of health and vigor like high intensity training does. Maybe it's just me. YMMV.

Re: Repeated six-second bursts of exercise 'can transform health'

#12

Great headline. Repeated bursts of ~6 seconds (aka interval training) is what they're talking about here, not 6 seconds total.

"A group of pensioners came into the lab twice a week for six weeks and went hell for leather on an exercise bike for six seconds.

They would allow their heart rate to recover and then go for it again, eventually building up to one minute of exercise by the end of the trial."

It actually sounds like they work up from 6 seconds in their first session to a minute per burst after a few weeks. The 6 seconds number is incredibly misleading in general, since this is just where they started out to get acclimated. It also leads me to believe that in the long run you may have to keep increasing this interval to get additional benefits. (Much like any endurance training.) I can imagine after a year maybe these folks would need to be doing 10 minute bursts. This would be awesome of course if they get there, and is still an improvement over the treadmill slog, but the headline here seems to make people think there is some free lunch in that you only need to do 6 seconds of exercise at a time to get healthy.

Re: Repeated six-second bursts of exercise 'can transform health'

#16
post #13

TL:DR Exercise is good for you. Working harder for less time is more beneficial than working less hard for greater time. I didn't see any really new information though.

The interesting part for me was the claim that brief, intense exercise was actually less dangerous than low-intensity, more prolonged exercise for the elderly.

That's not intuitive, to me -- I would have assumed that old folks should avoid sudden bursts of exercise (as "shaking things up" all of a sudden might provoke a heart attack or stroke).

I assume they'd still need to choose their activity carefully to avoid falls (particularly for osteoporosis or other known problems), but that's a separate question, and manageable with a little planning.

Re: Repeated six-second bursts of exercise 'can transform health'

#17
There are several problems with this kind of studies:

-Almost all kind of exercise will improve all markers in sedentary, not trained people.

-We all look for miracle solutions, but if you really want to improve it´ll take some time and long term commitment.

-Interval training works, but it´s currently sold as the solution for all the fitness problem. It has it´s own problems dough. Some of this problems are:

+Lack of proper warm up (Higher risk of injury)

+Lack of proper progression (just go and run), it's a dangerous way to stress an untrained cardiovascular system and muscular, esqueletical and connective tissues. They may not be able to manage the sudden stress and something may break.

+Lack of technique, running at slow speed is not that demanding, but an all-out sprint will increase the probability of an injury due to improper movement.

+Overtraing. Not even Olympic level athletes train all out all the time, the body needs recovery to improve. You give it some stress (not too much, just the least stress necessary) and then leave it to recover, It´s called overcompensation. If you are not training to obtain this overcompensation you are just wasting your time (or amusing yourself with a very high heart rate)

The biggest problem with all this fitness trends is that they oversimplify. Steady state low heart rate training has it´s place (creating an aerobic base level, improving technique, improving movement economy, recovery), as interval training does (pushing the anaerobic limit, increasing the VOmax, increasing the work capacity at max aerobic levels). Cardiovascular training is a continuum and isolating it´s parts leads to partial results.

To really be effective, they must be used inside a complete program, with volume and intensity progression, to allow the body to adapt progressively to the stress. With recovery periods (weekly monthly and yearly) to allow the body to recover and overcompensate (most interval training systems out there forget to tell people how to recover)

This may seem like loosing your time, after all people think that if you push yourself everyday you´ll end being the strongest, and the fastest. But this only leads fast to over training and injury.

The best a sedentary person can do is to look for a coach that´s able to create a long term plan adapted to her needs and goals. The plan needs to take care of aerobic-anaerobic progression (with the intervals at it's due time), muscular mass with proper care of balancing muscular groups (better muscular mass correlates to better long term health, balanced muscular groups greatly diminish the risk of injury), technique (if needed for the sport), mobility and stretching (if you are tight it´s easier to develop imbalances and to get an injury).

It´s complicated, and the knowledge needed to create a good training plan that adapts over time, takes much longer than a weekend certification course.

You don´t need a lot of time a week, 3 hours a week can take you very far. If you don´t have time for 3 hours/week to work out it´s better to start thinking in your priorities.

And for those who lack the resources for a coach (as it´s my case) there are out there very comprehensive and well thought standard training programs for different sports, put together by professional and national level Coaches in form of books, apps and web sites.

Edit: Paragraph arrangement.

Re: Repeated six-second bursts of exercise 'can transform health'

#19
post #17

There are several problems with this kind of studies: -Almost all kind of exercise will improve all markers in sedentary, not trained people. -We all look for miracle solutions, but if you really want to improve it´ll take some time and long term commitment. -Interval training works, but it´s currently sold as the solution for all the fitness problem. It has it´s own problems dough. Some of this problems are: +Lack o…

I have to point out none of the problems you point out are specific to HIIT.

Over training, lack of warmup and lack of technique can be problems with any exercise regime.

Re: Repeated six-second bursts of exercise 'can transform health'

#20
I am skeptical of the widely-held view that induced exercise extends lifespan. To my knowledge, there has been no study that demonstrates the effect that could be considered definitive. The physiological mechanism seems like wishful thinking. Reducing resting blood pressure is undoubtedly a good thing. But to lower resting blood pressure through exercise, your blood pressure has to be increased during exercise. So you haven't really changed the equilibrium. The likely result would be to reschedule cardiovascular events away from periods of rest to periods of exercise.
Post reply on HN