Live data from Hacker News

Choose hotels by the quality of their WiFi

hotelwifitest.com

51–60 of 240 posts

Re: Choose hotels by the quality of their WiFi

#51
post #3

Seems nice, although I have a 60Mbps line at home, and am only getting 30-40 Mbps on the speed test.

I have 50/100 FiOS and consistently get higher speeds in tests. The only ISP I've ever had where I get higher than advertised.

(They still suck, because HD Netflix is unusable at peak times without a VPN.)

Re: Choose hotels by the quality of their WiFi

#52
One thing that I noticed, is that the more expensive the hotel, the worst is the WiFI. Same applies when I have to pay for WiFI - the more I pay, the worst it is.

I've found that 3 star hotels that offer free WiFI usually have the best speeds/service. Whereas 5 star hotels that usually charge $14.95 daily have the worst.

Re: Choose hotels by the quality of their WiFi

#53

While the WiFi in most hotels is horrendous, wired internet is pretty awesome most of the time. A network cable is always in my suitcase and my laptop can run as an access point for my other devices. A separate access point could also come in handy (you have very small ones nowadays). During JSDay.it people had a lot of time even connecting to the WiFi while I was running at 80 mbps.

What's needed is a list of hotels that offer wired ethernet. Nobody seems to advertise that, and it can be hard to find out.

Re: Choose hotels by the quality of their WiFi

#55

One thing that I noticed, is that the more expensive the hotel, the worst is the WiFI. Same applies when I have to pay for WiFI - the more I pay, the worst it is. I've found that 3 star hotels that offer free WiFI usually have the best speeds/service. Whereas 5 star hotels that usually charge $14.95 daily have the worst.

> Whereas 5 star hotels that usually charge $14.95 daily have the worst.

The people that stay in these hotels normally aren't paying for the rooms (business trips for instance), so the company will pay the cost of the wifi for the duration of the stay without question

Re: Choose hotels by the quality of their WiFi

#56

While the WiFi in most hotels is horrendous, wired internet is pretty awesome most of the time. A network cable is always in my suitcase and my laptop can run as an access point for my other devices. A separate access point could also come in handy (you have very small ones nowadays). During JSDay.it people had a lot of time even connecting to the WiFi while I was running at 80 mbps.

+1 to this, I don't know how many times I've saved my bacon by having a access point with me. I use the TP-Link one (mid-tier Chinese OEM) and it has on more than one occassion gotten me much better wifi throughput than the hotel provided wireless. One hotel I stayed at had every access point on the same channel! That was kind of funny, in a sad you-really-don't-know-what-this-is-do-you sort of way.

Re: Choose hotels by the quality of their WiFi

#57
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wouldn't you just get a mobile hotspot? Or are you traveling to places with poor cell reception?

Mobile hotspots are good but expensive. My wife and I have been working/living off one for the past 6 weeks and we're averaging around $100/week on internet costs even with extremely limiting our usage.

How much data are you consuming? $100 a week!!

If you are in a Virgin Mobile (Sprint) 4G area with coverage - then buy one of their hotspots (used on ebay to save $$$), $5 a day buys you all the data you can eat & it stays fast. You can connect more than 2 devices. Save $86 a week.

Alternativly, get on Verizons pre-paid plan: $45 a month for unlimited voice & text, subscribe to auto-pay & you get 1GB a month for free. You can buy an additional 3GB for $20 - you have 90 days to use up the data, the use your iphone as a hotspot.

Re: Choose hotels by the quality of their WiFi

#60
post #13

I used to do consulting and traveled 100%. The term "High Speed Internet" is a common misnomer with Hotels, and was a bane of my existence, because it typically meant > 56k but These were with Hyatt, Marriott and Hilton hotels, mind you. If aggregaters like Hipmunk could incorporate this speed data, the way that they have with in-flight wifi, then hopefully there will be a push to improve this standard.

Ideally I'd like for Hipmunk not only to display the speed, but also optionally include the price in the totals, so that hotels with more-expensive wifi are penalized when hotels are sorted by price. I'm going to pay for it every day anyway if I go to that hotel, so I may as well have it reflected in the total.
Post reply on HN