Live data from Hacker News

Wayback Machine points to pro-Russia rebels in downing of MH17

csmonitor.com

21–30 of 113 posts

Re: Wayback Machine points to pro-Russia rebels in downing of MH17

#21
post #19

It's interesting how the right to be forgotten seems so desirable, yet when something like this happens it's great that no one can cover up their tracks. Now the pro-Russian separists are trying to delete all sorts of info. We have this tweet about them getting a bunch of anti-aircraft missiles ( http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:NF6E5FC... ), showing off their new toys ( https://twitter.com/grassw…

Who said there is a right to be forgotten?

The EU: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/files/factsheets...

Re: Wayback Machine points to pro-Russia rebels in downing of MH17

#22
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Who said there is a right to be forgotten?

The EU: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/files/factsheets...

It would be worth actually reading that PDF to see what it defines the right as including and not including.

Re: Wayback Machine points to pro-Russia rebels in downing of MH17

#24
post #8

It's interesting how the right to be forgotten seems so desirable, yet when something like this happens it's great that no one can cover up their tracks. Now the pro-Russian separists are trying to delete all sorts of info. We have this tweet about them getting a bunch of anti-aircraft missiles ( http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:NF6E5FC... ), showing off their new toys ( https://twitter.com/grassw…

> It's interesting how the right to be forgotten seems so desirable, yet when something like this happens it's great that no one can cover up their tracks. Now the pro-Russian separists are trying to delete all sorts of info. Are war crimes what 'right to be forgotten' is all about?

> Are war crimes what 'right to be forgotten' is all about?

Of course not. I think OP is just pointing out that there are pros and cons.

OTOH, if I were leading a technologically sophisticated country to war and had the ability, I might look for ways to make my opponent look bad- say, by posting to internet forums using their hacked accounts- and trust that the internet would not forget.

Re: Wayback Machine points to pro-Russia rebels in downing of MH17

#25
post #17

Does VK not block spiders like Facebook does? This makes a compelling case against Facebook's policies. If it had been posted only to a Facebook page, WM couldn't have archived it. Somebody else could have, but chances are they would be less impartial about the material they were scraping.

[deleted]

Re: Wayback Machine points to pro-Russia rebels in downing of MH17

#26
Worth noting: Two days ago, an actual AN-26 cargo plane was shot down [1]. At the time, Ukraine assumed it had to be a Russian missile, because they did not think the rebels had the ability to shoot anything above a ceiling of about 2.5 kilometers. This seems to be confirming that the rebels are the ones doing the shooting. The intelligence agencies of the world are having a busy day, I'm sure.

[1] http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/15/world/europe/ukrainian-mil...

Re: Wayback Machine points to pro-Russia rebels in downing of MH17

#27
post #17

Does VK not block spiders like Facebook does? This makes a compelling case against Facebook's policies. If it had been posted only to a Facebook page, WM couldn't have archived it. Somebody else could have, but chances are they would be less impartial about the material they were scraping.

It's a public page, not a profile. The posts are visible to everyone including web crawlers. (I'm using VK)

Re: Wayback Machine points to pro-Russia rebels in downing of MH17

#28

It's interesting how the right to be forgotten seems so desirable, yet when something like this happens it's great that no one can cover up their tracks. Now the pro-Russian separists are trying to delete all sorts of info. We have this tweet about them getting a bunch of anti-aircraft missiles ( http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:NF6E5FC... ), showing off their new toys ( https://twitter.com/grassw…

I don't think that anyone is advocating the 'right to be forgotten' as a way of wiping all content you don't like about yourself from the Internet, or even that it extends to content less than a day old.

It has more to do with companies keeping their records on you from now until they go bankrupt (and then sell that data off as an asset to appease their creditors).

Re: Wayback Machine points to pro-Russia rebels in downing of MH17

#29
post #8

It's interesting how the right to be forgotten seems so desirable, yet when something like this happens it's great that no one can cover up their tracks. Now the pro-Russian separists are trying to delete all sorts of info. We have this tweet about them getting a bunch of anti-aircraft missiles ( http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:NF6E5FC... ), showing off their new toys ( https://twitter.com/grassw…

> It's interesting how the right to be forgotten seems so desirable, yet when something like this happens it's great that no one can cover up their tracks. Now the pro-Russian separists are trying to delete all sorts of info. Are war crimes what 'right to be forgotten' is all about?

Most (adversited) decisions are about elected officials and executives failing their duties. There is a difference between dodging taxes and slaughtering civilians, but the idea (jail sentences for people with political power) is close enough for lawyers to see the need for clarification.

Re: Wayback Machine points to pro-Russia rebels in downing of MH17

#30
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Who said there is a right to be forgotten?

The EU: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/files/factsheets...

I meant it in a way, does it make sense really? I think not. At least not in the way EU did it.
Post reply on HN