Philosophically or practically: What's the justification for nearly everyone switching to flat design? Is there any articulable reason it's "better" than the rich, three-dimensional style[1] that was previously popular? Or is it just an arbitrary trend? Some say the change is driven by high-DPI displays. I disagree. I don't see any intrinsic reason that flat designs look better than rich, three-dimensional designs on…
A flat icon set for OS X
21–30 of 58 posts
Re: A flat icon set for OS X
#22Philosophically or practically: What's the justification for nearly everyone switching to flat design? Is there any articulable reason it's "better" than the rich, three-dimensional style[1] that was previously popular? Or is it just an arbitrary trend? Some say the change is driven by high-DPI displays. I disagree. I don't see any intrinsic reason that flat designs look better than rich, three-dimensional designs on…
Here are a few theories: is it's a refinement of the icon concept, taking it to a higher level of abstraction.
Possibly the reduced visual noise has a greater aesthetic appeal.
Lastly I think the simplification makes it easier to see at a glance what the icon represents.
Re: A flat icon set for OS X
#23Along the same vein: http://appicns.com
Re: A flat icon set for OS X
#24Re: A flat icon set for OS X
#25I like these, but they seem a bit fuzzy to my non retina macbook display. Particularly the music and calendar app icons just seem overly aliased. Can anyone else confirm?
Re: A flat icon set for OS X
#26Philosophically or practically: What's the justification for nearly everyone switching to flat design? Is there any articulable reason it's "better" than the rich, three-dimensional style[1] that was previously popular? Or is it just an arbitrary trend? Some say the change is driven by high-DPI displays. I disagree. I don't see any intrinsic reason that flat designs look better than rich, three-dimensional designs on…
For me, I like flat design (to an extent) because it gives the product a more uniform look and feel, but sometimes it can be overdone and I find myself wishing there were an illusion of depth to guide me.
Re: A flat icon set for OS X
#27Philosophically or practically: What's the justification for nearly everyone switching to flat design? Is there any articulable reason it's "better" than the rich, three-dimensional style[1] that was previously popular? Or is it just an arbitrary trend? Some say the change is driven by high-DPI displays. I disagree. I don't see any intrinsic reason that flat designs look better than rich, three-dimensional designs on…
Re: A flat icon set for OS X
#28Philosophically or practically: What's the justification for nearly everyone switching to flat design? Is there any articulable reason it's "better" than the rich, three-dimensional style[1] that was previously popular? Or is it just an arbitrary trend? Some say the change is driven by high-DPI displays. I disagree. I don't see any intrinsic reason that flat designs look better than rich, three-dimensional designs on…
However, design is also trend-oriented, and flat is a rising trend.
Re: A flat icon set for OS X
#29I may be in the minority, but these feel really boring and dull to me. I think there is a way to have a "flat" icon while still providing some depth to them. I've also seen dozens and dozens of flat icon sets for Android that basically have this same exact look. Just go to XDA or the Play Store and search "flat icons", I'm sure you'll find a bunch that have a mix of these designs.
Re: A flat icon set for OS X
#30Seems like you can't change the calendar icon. The calendar ICNS is used for the first time after cache reset, but once calendar opens, it uses its own embedded empty calendar icon and fills in the date. Any way for liteicon to change that blank calendar? I noticed you provided the blank calendar icns. I suppose I could open up Calendar and replace it to try it out.