51–60 of 74 posts
I can't read this article without allowing Javascript.
Note to site designers: something is terribly wrong if JS is needed to render the main textual content of your site.
I can't read this article without allowing Javascript.
That is true for about 50% of the links posted here these days. I usually just close the tab and read the comments on HN. Note to site designers: something is terribly wrong if JS is needed to render the main textual content of your site.
Web browsers are an execution environment, no longer just document viewers.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is a separate emoji panel, but in my experience you tend to remember the name of the emoji used the most, and in 10-key mode it's pretty fast to type a 2 or 3 kana word. About the android phones, I was a bit surprised by the low quality of Japanese support. But I didn't try the ATOK keyboard nor the input available on Sony phones for instance, only the Google IME. To Apple's credit, they've been doing IME on th…
The Japanese android vendor keyboards do seem to be generally much more polished than google's effort, although the latter is ok for basic Japanese input. The main issue with conversion-based emoji seems to be discoverability.... Besides those reflecting basic concepts, there are tons of odd or intricate emoji that you'd never even imagine existed unless you saw them first; even once you know they exist, figuring out…
[0] http://matsucon.net/material/dic/kao01.html [1] http://plaza.rakuten.co.jp/love2kaomoji/5007/
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That is true for about 50% of the links posted here these days. I usually just close the tab and read the comments on HN. Note to site designers: something is terribly wrong if JS is needed to render the main textual content of your site.
Or just get with the program and allow JS. It's not going away, as flawed a language as it is. Web browsers are an execution environment, no longer just document viewers.
This is offtopic, but I really miss emoji for "shrug" - expression of I don't know and I don't care. They should add something like that to Unicode.
> Doesn't support gradients
yeah, nah
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or just get with the program and allow JS. It's not going away, as flawed a language as it is. Web browsers are an execution environment, no longer just document viewers.
What about Braille readers and stuff like that? How well do they support javascript?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That is true for about 50% of the links posted here these days. I usually just close the tab and read the comments on HN. Note to site designers: something is terribly wrong if JS is needed to render the main textual content of your site.
Or just get with the program and allow JS. It's not going away, as flawed a language as it is. Web browsers are an execution environment, no longer just document viewers.