Tinder's Forgotten Woman: Whitney Wolfe, Sexism, and Startup Creation Myths
1–10 of 102 posts
Re: Tinder's Forgotten Woman: Whitney Wolfe, Sexism, and Startup Creation Myths
#2Also, NSFW Instagram images.
Re: Tinder's Forgotten Woman: Whitney Wolfe, Sexism, and Startup Creation Myths
#3Re: Tinder's Forgotten Woman: Whitney Wolfe, Sexism, and Startup Creation Myths
#4Pretty shocking revelations. Was this ever revealed before? Only because of Wolfe's firing?
Re: Tinder's Forgotten Woman: Whitney Wolfe, Sexism, and Startup Creation Myths
#5Pretty shocking revelations. Was this ever revealed before? Only because of Wolfe's firing?
It's likely that current events help explain some oddities in Tinder's past.
Re: Tinder's Forgotten Woman: Whitney Wolfe, Sexism, and Startup Creation Myths
#6Re: Tinder's Forgotten Woman: Whitney Wolfe, Sexism, and Startup Creation Myths
#7As an aside, Mateen exhibits the textbook Madonna-whore dichotomy. To him, women are either someone he can see being a wife (Wolfe pre-breakup), or a whore/bimbo/slut (the women on his Instagram feed). When she rejected him, in classic fashion she went from the former bucket to the latter. This is a case study for a gender-studies paper.
[1] http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Tinderslut
Re: Tinder's Forgotten Woman: Whitney Wolfe, Sexism, and Startup Creation Myths
#8Despite the linkbaity headline, this article actually adds new information and context to the controversy. Also, NSFW Instagram images.
Re: Tinder's Forgotten Woman: Whitney Wolfe, Sexism, and Startup Creation Myths
#9Interesting that Tinder is owned by the company behind Match.com.
Re: Tinder's Forgotten Woman: Whitney Wolfe, Sexism, and Startup Creation Myths
#10Despite the linkbaity headline, this article actually adds new information and context to the controversy. Also, NSFW Instagram images.
Yes people. Please flag [EDIT, as in write "NSFW" when applicable. Thanks shawnz]. The article feels that is going to be serious, which it kind of is, but then the pics. What was the point of that? The writer could not have simply mentioned the pics ?