Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Free, anonymous coding interview practice

interviewing.io

91–100 of 223 posts

Re: Show HN: Free, anonymous coding interview practice

#91
I had the same idea a year ago :) Simply, Google and other companies do CV, 2 phone screens and on-site. Someone could handle for them CV and 1st phone screen. They would not only save 45mins for recruiters and devs, but will get extra productivity. No distraction for hackers.

Charge a little to filter out people that clicked, but don't care. I'd pay.

Re: Show HN: Free, anonymous coding interview practice

#92
post #84
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

After the second interview I had an entire email written out that I was going to send to their lead, but honestly, given that the app that they asked me to develop prior to the interview was well done, detailed, commented and modern, complete with a PR flow that me and one of their devs went through via GitHub, I felt that if they were willing to pass due to me obviously locking up on a Skype + Google-Doc shared whit…

For those interviewers and candidates looking for a better solution than the "google doc shared whiteboard" - I suggest checking out a product I make: https://coderpad.io/ You can think of it as a much higher fidelity Stypi, Etherpad, Collabedit, etc, except that you can run the code in the browser as you write it . It really helps alleviate the choking sensation of being asked to write out an entire problem on a whi…

Yeah, this actually did seem to lead to some confusion, which was the first bad sign. Google Docs obviously doesn't know how to format code, and the indentation was getting messy during the typing process leading me to have to break, think, fix indentation, resume thought, then answer to the questioner about my "preference for three spaces or two"... ? It was an obscene process that could have definitely been refined by your app and possibly led to a better outcome.

Re: Show HN: Free, anonymous coding interview practice

#93
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

After the second interview I had an entire email written out that I was going to send to their lead, but honestly, given that the app that they asked me to develop prior to the interview was well done, detailed, commented and modern, complete with a PR flow that me and one of their devs went through via GitHub, I felt that if they were willing to pass due to me obviously locking up on a Skype + Google-Doc shared whit…

"I felt that if they were willing to pass due to me obviously locking up on a Skype + Google-Doc shared whiteboard, and on the most basic of JavaScript skills (which were clearly elaborated upon within the project)" Or it could be a simple miscommunication, or they thought somebody else done the app given your performance on the interview. Reaching out and asking will cost you little compared to potential windfall.

Exactly. I mean, it would take a fairly skeptical person to think that you submitted someone else's code but maybe they just weren't willing to take the risk.

Either way, I think you've nothing to lose by sending that mail/picking up the phone. Regardless of the doubts the interviewer may have in you post-interview they'll know that everybody is prone to a bad day every once in a while.

Re: Show HN: Free, anonymous coding interview practice

#95
post #5

Good idea! It leapfrogs the scores of existing "code interview practice tools" that give you a problem and a text editor and do some auto-validation on your answer by providing a human element. Something like this seems like a more relevant kind of practice. How does the business model here work? Are interviewers paid? Are you planning on eventually expanding into recruiting?

hey, good question. right now, interviewers aren't paid, but that may change. re business model, ultimately, i'd like to have this platform be something companies can use to find candidates rather than relying on proxies like pedigree (or resume, for that matter!).

what do interviewers get out of it if they don't get paid? Are they employees?

Re: Show HN: Free, anonymous coding interview practice

#97
post #76
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That is awesome. I like; "That problem has been solved so I'd Google it". Your answer is faster.

-In elementary school when you were learning to do algebra did you say... Chill, he said 'so'. i think he was just saying he looked up the answer but that persons answer was faster

Thanks autokad. base698 has the right interpretation: My response was the smarmy answer I have given in interview situations where I just felt rebellious against the energy of interviewer combined with the test questions. I actually agree with base698. An understanding of the basics is required. And the companies I've coded for - for long periods of time, and loved working at - figured out I knew the basics based on our conversations alone. I hire people without testing. It has not backfired yet. I have also tested others in the past, had people pass the test, only come on board to be dangerous to production environments.

Re: Show HN: Free, anonymous coding interview practice

#98

Dear software professional: if you have been rejected because of a coding interview, don't feel bad or discouraged. It has little to do with how smart you are. Unfortunately, this style of interviews is likely ineffective and leads to hiring people who look alike and have similar skills. Solving a problem with someone looking over your shoulder and forcing you to talk to explain what you are thinking is a skill that…

The analogy I use is a coding interview is like asking a musician to play a specific song; chances are, a classically trained pianist won't know the chords to a specific pop song, but that isn't any indication of their skill as a musician.

The interviews I had with the company I work for now were amazing; they asked me some basic questions to verify my resume wasn't completely BS, then asked me to discuss previous projects I'd worked on, asking questions about technical details on the way. ("Why did you use collection type X in stead of collection type Y?") This allowed them to learn about my real world experience without the risk of asking me about one specific type of problem I may not be familiar with.

Re: Show HN: Free, anonymous coding interview practice

#99

This is a very promising idea. I always crack when it comes to algorithm type question. I am aware of some of the run of the mill ones like, write a palindrome detector, bubble sort. However, I still can't figure out the crazy hard ones like: In a pyramid of numbers, write an algorithm to find the path to the biggest sum. Write a method to produce pascal's triangle. Given a grid, where X = wall, O = space, write an a…

tree of numbers -> keep track of the sum as you work your way down the branch. every visit to a node, check if that sum of the parent plus your current node is larger your your current max. if it is, replace your max, keep traversing your tree.

Re: Show HN: Free, anonymous coding interview practice

#100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For me, even worse than an in person interview is a remote coding interview over the phone. Usually some sort of screen sharing + phone call. I find it incredibly nerve wracking because it gives me that feeling of someone standing over my shoulder without me being able to fully interact with them or read their body language. When you sit down to hammer out a solution you have all the additional pressure of trying to…

Worse, you simply have no way of knowing what their evaluation criteria are. Maybe they want you to be slow and thorough (I've been nailed for not checking the exit status of print statements). OR maybe they want it quick and dirty, in which case you'll get nailed for "overengineering", or you just wont have time to do it the imaginary time frames they set for these tasks, if you go for any of the defensive practices…

Very much yes. In an interview I was prompted to write some code that ran as quickly as possible. 10 minutes in they were concerned that I hadn't started with a naive proof-of-concept solution and improved from there. I don't disagree with their idea of good programming practice, but how could I know they wouldn't penalize me for coming up with a slow naive solution, when the prompt specifically said to run as quickly as possible?
Post reply on HN