"The Selfish Gene" by Dawkins. This was a result of asking my Twitter friends to decide between this and Art of War for me, and this won overwhelmingly. It's been a great read so far, and I'm really looking forward to learning more about how evolution and computer science can mix.
Dawkins is eminently readable, even in books that you think you know what he's going to say. I also recommend The God Delusion.
What are you reading?
131–140 of 222 posts
Re: What are you reading?
#132Re: What are you reading?
#133Re: What are you reading?
#134probably the best self-help book I've ever read.. Teaches a lot about how to think.
Re: What are you reading?
#135I got books like sheiks got oil. I'm swimming in them. I try to read a little from at least four books every day. (You'll have to look up these links yourself) ----------------------------------------------------------- On my Kindle: Anna Karenina, Tolstoy; Clean Code, Uncle Bob; Palm WebOS; Antoninus Meditations, Marcus Aurelius, Emperor; Never Eat Alone, and Other Secrets to Success, Ferrazzi ----------------------…
Re: What are you reading?
#136I am reading way too many books at once. Not in danger of finishing them all, but in the last month I have read from: Technical: Armstrong, Programming Erlang Oppenheim et al, Signals and Systems Abelson and Sussman, SICP The Fourier Transform and its Applications Project Management for Construction Nontechnical: Russel, History of Western Philosophy The Autobiography of Malcolm X Schelling, Strategy of Conflict The…
I think everyone should take an hour to sit down and read the first chapter, even if they don't like books.
Re: What are you reading?
#137Titan: The Life of John D. Rockefeller, Sr. and The Big Rich: The Rise and Fall of the Greatest Texas Oil Fortunes
Re: What are you reading?
#138Omnivore's Dilemma. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Omnivore%27s_Dilemma
Re: What are you reading?
#139Re: What are you reading?
#140Finishing "Atlas Shrugged". While ideas and the spirit of the book have aged only slightly, the way of writing seems way too pretentious for our times. But overall the book is interesting. From historic and ideological point of view.
Ayn Rand was able to name so much of what I've felt growing up. While she may have used the literary technique of exaggeration to heighten the contrast between her philosophical views of moral vs. immoral, I don't think she took it "too far" as others are commenting. I think that's like saying Philip K. Dick took the ideas of technological advances and psychic ability too far in his story, "Minority Report", or like…