Live data from Hacker News

Pilot lands faulty fighter jet on a stool at sea [video]

bbc.co.uk

11–20 of 35 posts

Re: Pilot lands faulty fighter jet on a stool at sea [video]

#13
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't understand the distinction you are trying to make. Even if it's purpose built, it still fits the definition of a stool.

A stool is something I sit on, not something an aircraft lands on.

Schrodinger's stool? the stool is not until it's sat on?

Re: Pilot lands faulty fighter jet on a stool at sea [video]

#19

What would've happened had the "stool" not been there? It seemed (though perhaps the footage was slowed) that the plane descended vertically pretty slowly, so it would've banged the nose on the carrier at touchdown, but would that have been severe?

It would certainly have grounded the aircraft until it could be inspected/repaired back on land and it would probably have destroyed the radar housed in the aircraft's nose.
Post reply on HN