WillYouHack.Me?

#1

Post by hansy » Tue, Jun 24, 2014, 1:20 AM UTC

WillYouHack.Me?
willyouhack.me

Re: WillYouHack.Me?

#2

Post by wingerlang » Tue, Jun 24, 2014, 3:29 AM UTC

> function decrypt(a){return "a";}

notAdmin

a

"Login complete, and notAdmin is Admin."

Reminds me of when I made a login-form in flash, that simply redirected the browser to "hiddenLoggedIn.html". To be fair I was around 13.

Re: WillYouHack.Me?

#3

Post by dwyer » Tue, Jun 24, 2014, 3:32 AM UTC

> {user: "aBlackDude", pass: "12inches", flag: "u"}

Cool racism, bro.

Re: WillYouHack.Me?

#4

Post by kevinschumacher » Tue, Jun 24, 2014, 3:36 AM UTC

Reminds me of hackthissite.org

Re: WillYouHack.Me?

#5

Post by loopdoend » Tue, Jun 24, 2014, 3:41 AM UTC

This only serves to illustrate why relying on obfuscation to protect you via security-through-obscurity is ridiculous. Commercial Javascript libraries with DRM should take note.

Re: WillYouHack.Me?

#6

Post by drunkcatsdgaf » Tue, Jun 24, 2014, 3:43 AM UTC

Surprised no one has really hacked you on godaddy.

Re: WillYouHack.Me?

#7

Post by markcampbell » Tue, Jun 24, 2014, 3:53 AM UTC

  currentUser = users[2].user; function checkUserNameAndPass() { return true; }

Re: WillYouHack.Me?

#8

Post by cwb71 » Tue, Jun 24, 2014, 3:57 AM UTC

dwyer wrote: post #3

> {user: "aBlackDude", pass: "12inches", flag: "u"} Cool racism, bro.

Yeah, keep it classy.

Re: WillYouHack.Me?

#9

Post by im3w1l » Tue, Jun 24, 2014, 4:00 AM UTC

That's an "unconventional" way of using the switch/case construct. But it doesn't seem to matter in this case. Intentional?

md5 of password is 44f02a78f5203c7c41463c75aba9e9cc.

Re: WillYouHack.Me?

#10

Post by jayd3e » Tue, Jun 24, 2014, 4:19 AM UTC

kevinschumacher wrote: post #4

Reminds me of hackthissite.org

Came here to say this. That site was so awesome back in the day. Still is.