> Our education system is propped up chiefly because of government.
Obviously not propped enough if this professor died in poverty and students need 6 figure loans to graduate.
> Most of the US goes to public schools, controlled by the government.
As opposed to what? Controlled by Coca-Cola? Starbucks? -- "Do you have a degree?" -- "I sure do, I graduated with MS in coffee arts (MsCA) from Starbucks University, Phoenix". Or just got a "PhD in applied lobbying from Lockheed".
> Students get ridiculous loans they can't default on, courtesy of the government.
The problem is not to just stop giving loans, but let people go to universities without needing loans. If Universities are public, they should admit based on merit. And instead of cycling money through govt to student to university, just subsidize the university and make sure it doesn't spend money on admin assistants, triple layers of bureaucracy, new gyms with lazy rivers and other crap that is not needed. Maybe if it is too hard, just increase % of admitted students based on merit, some that couldn't quite make it and are rich perhaps could buy their way in.
> maybe regulation and government caused the problem in the first place.
Can you point to an example of an attested and well functioning higher learning system not regulated and propped by a government?