I m wondering if there is any alternative to storing API keys and tokens in the source of the app ? Proxying all calls through our own server seems like an expensive way of solving this problem. Because if the client is compromised it doesn't do much anyway.
There is a tool for moving API keys out of the source: Keystok stores encrypted API keys and tokes in a cloud service and lets the App / client retrieve them during runtime. Its not just about moving keys out of the source, but about getting rid of local config files altogether. Related post on their blog: http://blog.keystok.com/why-i-stopped-using-local-config-fil... Disclosure: I'm a developer at Keystok.
Thousands of secret keys found in Android apps
31–40 of 40 posts
Re: Thousands of secret keys found in Android apps
#32What a non article. As if iPhone apps don't have these keys in them. So, now you have those keys. What are you going to do with them? Just because you have the "app" key doesn't mean you have access to any sort data. The worst you can do is write an authentication flow with some other companies app keys, and then what? Can someone please explain what the security issue here is?
Some Websites require you to pay money for access to their API. Some of them also have a HTML5-App (with a wrapper) available for Android. This app uses the same API. So some malicious developer could just unzip the app, read the JavaScript and find the API-key, and use their key instead of paying for one. And as the website usually has many accesses from the same IP (due to mobile users being behind NATs), the Websi…
Re: Thousands of secret keys found in Android apps
#33> This can mean several things, but it also means that users can never be 100 percent certain that the app they are downloading is entirely secure. I wonder in what circumstances the author thinks users can be 100% certain that the app they are downloading is entirely secure. Cause, yeah, there aren't any.
Presumably, if 1. the user is side-loading an app they wrote themselves (or is an internal Apple/Google developer who uploaded an app to their app store and audited the entire sausage-making process as it transpired), and 2. the app does literally nothing, then the user can be 100 percent certain that the app does what it does securely.
Re: Thousands of secret keys found in Android apps
#34I m wondering if there is any alternative to storing API keys and tokens in the source of the app ? Proxying all calls through our own server seems like an expensive way of solving this problem. Because if the client is compromised it doesn't do much anyway.
One solution would be for Apple and Android to have an "environment" section for applications. You'd be able to set these environment keys when publishing the app.
Apple and Android could provide an API to these environment keys, and they'd be published in an encrypted form as part of the application manifest.
Bonus Points: It would be relatively simple to provide the facility from the AppStore provider for changing / cancelling these keys.
Re: Thousands of secret keys found in Android apps
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
Having read the paper [1], the authors suggest the following as a solution to the API key conundrum: To avoid the need of storing secret tokens on a mobile device, Facebook leverages the presence of the official Facebook Android application on Android devices. The Facebook SDK allows third-party applications to use Android intents to proxy requests for user access tokens through Facebook's Android application, where…
Facebook require you to create an "Application" on their developers website which corresponds to your Android app. Within the settings for your Facebook application you have to register details of your Android application - the package name and some sort of information on the key it's signed with (If my recall is correct - I've not done it for about 6 months). Because you've registered this information, Facebook will…
*edit I mean it's not true that the attacker can't impersonate your app. Your description of how it works looks right on to me. :)
Re: Thousands of secret keys found in Android apps
#36I m wondering if there is any alternative to storing API keys and tokens in the source of the app ? Proxying all calls through our own server seems like an expensive way of solving this problem. Because if the client is compromised it doesn't do much anyway.
Shoot me down if I'm missing something obvious here, but: One solution would be for Apple and Android to have an "environment" section for applications. You'd be able to set these environment keys when publishing the app. Apple and Android could provide an API to these environment keys, and they'd be published in an encrypted form as part of the application manifest. Bonus Points: It would be relatively simple to pro…
Re: Thousands of secret keys found in Android apps
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
Facebook require you to create an "Application" on their developers website which corresponds to your Android app. Within the settings for your Facebook application you have to register details of your Android application - the package name and some sort of information on the key it's signed with (If my recall is correct - I've not done it for about 6 months). Because you've registered this information, Facebook will…
That's not true totally, since you can side load on Android it's trivial to spoof an App Identity to match what the facebook app is expecting. You can get the Identity from the original app. What is somewhat more difficult is doing this across a bunch of phones since the Play store won't register your app if it's spoofing another apps id. In the end it's just a series of hoops to jump through like almost all security…
https://github.com/facebook/facebook-android-sdk/blob/master...
Re: Thousands of secret keys found in Android apps
#38So this relates to the API keys used by developers to access their own backend APIs and the APIs of third parties, such as Facebook or Twitter. There are suggestions in comments here that you hide your third party API keys in your own backend server, and your app queries for the API keys and then makes the call from the client using the temporary downloaded keys. So how do you secure your own server's API keys? That'…
Having read the paper [1], the authors suggest the following as a solution to the API key conundrum: To avoid the need of storing secret tokens on a mobile device, Facebook leverages the presence of the official Facebook Android application on Android devices. The Facebook SDK allows third-party applications to use Android intents to proxy requests for user access tokens through Facebook's Android application, where…
The process is described here: https://developers.facebook.com/docs/android/getting-started...
The Facebook app for Android is closed source; however, the Facebook Android SDK seems to verify requests from the Facebook app in a similar way: https://github.com/facebook/facebook-android-sdk/blob/master...
I imagine that it works like that the other way around as well: Check whether the code signature of the Intent's sender matches the app developer certificate.
Re: Thousands of secret keys found in Android apps
#39I am surprised that more developers do not run a code scrambler on their code before compiling a release. Also, why would you name the variable where you store the key "FACEBOOK_CUSTOMER_SECRET" rather than "AKED223KWN" or something else random. And, why wouldn't you at least pad and scramble the key, so it would be a little harder to pick it out of memory.
security through obscurity, not a good idea.
Re: Thousands of secret keys found in Android apps
#40I am surprised that more developers do not run a code scrambler on their code before compiling a release. Also, why would you name the variable where you store the key "FACEBOOK_CUSTOMER_SECRET" rather than "AKED223KWN" or something else random. And, why wouldn't you at least pad and scramble the key, so it would be a little harder to pick it out of memory.
That's not how API keys work; scramble them and they're different. What I gathered is that the authors didn't look for glaringly obvious things like variable names, but did a more generic scan for strings or keys that look like encryption keys. Obfuscation won't help there. I don't know if it's possible to encrypt your entire codebase and still end up with a workable app - after all, the decryption would still need t…
Also, scrambling function and variable names is always a good idea, it makes reverse engineering your app a lot harder. And there are many programs on the market that will do this for you automatically.