(I may make this question a separate post to HN, it's been bothering me for a while.)
IBM takes first 3D image of atomic bonds
31–40 of 63 posts
Re: IBM takes first 3D image of atomic bonds
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
True. But would it be too far-fetched to claim that the quality of a website / blog can be indirectly measured by the quality of its comments? A quality blog should not tolerate certain comments which are more appropriate for YouTube.
Sigh, when you find the answer to that question, let me know ...
Call me elitist if you will. BTW, my question was rhetorical.
Re: IBM takes first 3D image of atomic bonds
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think there would be major issues getting folded protein to 5K. Plus proteins "live" in 300K and the oscillations are probably very important for the function (perhaps even more than a single arbitrary structure you would get from a picture like this).
Yes to all of the above. Not to mention that we've long been able to visualize protein molecular structure using X-rays and NMR. This probably isn't very useful to anything related to proteins.