Live data from Hacker News

Push to ban plastic microbeads from facial scrubs gains momentum

cbc.ca

21–30 of 48 posts

Re: Push to ban plastic microbeads from facial scrubs gains momentum

#21
post #9

It seems to me like it would be better in the long run to invest money in developing better water treatment plants rather than getting on the ban-wagon. It seems logical that we could skim these out as they are as the article attests "boyant".

Why does it "seem" that way to you? Do you have experience with filtering systems, and the costs associated with them? Or, is it because you have experience with bans?

[deleted]

Re: Push to ban plastic microbeads from facial scrubs gains momentum

#22

Are there non-plastic alternatives on the books? I'm all for protecting nature, but these microbeads are useful as an abrasive element (meaning more thorough cleaning). Maybe sterilized sand?

You mean, aside from the ones mentioned in the linked article: "natural alternatives like ground almonds, sea salt or oatmeal" (which is, I believe, what was used before microbeads were available).

Re: Push to ban plastic microbeads from facial scrubs gains momentum

#24

Are there non-plastic alternatives on the books? I'm all for protecting nature, but these microbeads are useful as an abrasive element (meaning more thorough cleaning). Maybe sterilized sand?

I use a brand called Bulldog that uses ground up coconut shell's. It feels like it works better...maybe because its not made up of perfect little spheres of plastic?

Re: Push to ban plastic microbeads from facial scrubs gains momentum

#25
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why does it "seem" that way to you? Do you have experience with filtering systems, and the costs associated with them? Or, is it because you have experience with bans?

[deleted]

No one besides you mentioned a degree.

They're questioning if you have any relevant experience with the topic which informs your opinion, or you think that the solution to a complex environmental problem is the first thing that "felt right" or "made sense" to you.

Re: Push to ban plastic microbeads from facial scrubs gains momentum

#26
>The highest concentration was found in Lake Ontario, with counts of up to 1.1 million plastic particles per square kilometre.

1.1 million 1mm diameter beads in 1 sq km doesn't seem like much, like 1 bead per million sq mm. But there shouldn't really be any of these. Kind of a ridiculous idea to begin with.

Re: Push to ban plastic microbeads from facial scrubs gains momentum

#27
post #14
post #9

It seems to me like it would be better in the long run to invest money in developing better water treatment plants rather than getting on the ban-wagon. It seems logical that we could skim these out as they are as the article attests "boyant".

How would you pay for the upgrade of all water treatment plants? A special tax on microbeads?

We'd also need a Federal-level "Microbead Czar".

Re: Push to ban plastic microbeads from facial scrubs gains momentum

#28

Are there non-plastic alternatives on the books? I'm all for protecting nature, but these microbeads are useful as an abrasive element (meaning more thorough cleaning). Maybe sterilized sand?

You can make your own with equal parts coconut oil and sugar. Searching for "sugar scrub recipe" yields dozens of homemade recipes for facial and body scrubs that are natural and relatively inexpensive. Depending on where the ingredients are sourced, they're fairly environmentally sound.

Re: Push to ban plastic microbeads from facial scrubs gains momentum

#30

Are there non-plastic alternatives on the books? I'm all for protecting nature, but these microbeads are useful as an abrasive element (meaning more thorough cleaning). Maybe sterilized sand?

The classic stuff that is extremely common is apricot scrub. They grind up apricot pits for the scrub.
Post reply on HN