Live data from Hacker News

Only Apple

daringfireball.net

31–40 of 182 posts

Re: Only Apple

#31

I don't get what the significance of this post is, and why it is at the top of HN. Company A does this and Company B does that and these two are a little similar but not really and this other Company wants this but can't get it. Only this Company. Yeah not that Company. See I figured all this out; see how smart I am? Now and then on a lazy sunday morning with a cuppa in hand and the business news in my lap, I sink in…

I actually upvoted the post for the comedy value.

Re: Only Apple

#32
I guess this might be focused on the consumer end, but if you're looking for this in the enterprise, you can get it from IBM and Oracle. You can buy Oracle (Sun) hardware, Solaris, WebLogic, and Oracle database and never use a non-Oracle product. Same with IBM.

And maybe I'm cynical, but "unified ecosystem" sounds a lot like "total vendor lock-in" to me.

Re: Only Apple

#33
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I simply don't believe Google has the best interests of anyone at heart except themselves and advertisers. You think Apple has your interests at heart? Or Microsoft? Like Google, they have your cash at heart. Not a thing more.

Yes, my cash - the end user. Not other companies looking to get my "attention"

The fact that apple apps such as itunes do not work on android only serves apple and their lockin strategy, not you or your cash.

Re: Only Apple

#34
post #13

Daring Fireball is hard to read because the website is so poorly formatted. I rarely make it past the first paragraph. The font is too small, the margins are too huge and the colors have poor contrast.

Margins are irrelevant; it's the column width that matters.

I agree that the font size is too small (I use the NoSquint plug-in to remember a 200% zoom for it) but the column width is bang on with about ten words per line.

Re: Only Apple

#35

There is always a lot of careful insight in Gruber's posts that I like but it is tainted with a type of enthusiasm that doesn't belong in journalism. Even if he is correct, being a cheerleader with liberal praise isn't analysis. It's opinion, and Gruber often reads like an opinionist. Apple is an amazing position to build all kinds of wonderful technology, and Samsung does come across as a shallow copy cat that throw…

he is an apple-centric blogger writing for his own site. where exactly does journalism ever come in play here? don't think gruber ever claimed to be a "journalist".

"Journalism is a method of inquiry and literary style that aims to provide a service to the public by the dissemination and analysis of news and other information."[1]

Is that not what he's doing? Is he just gratifying a need to be heard or something? I don't think so, it looks like he's attempting to perform journalism as described by this paragraph, and he falls short in some ways.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journalism

Re: Only Apple

#36
> It has long been axiomatic that Apple is not the sort of company that could walk and chew gum at the same time. In 2007, they issued a (very Steve Jobs-sounding) press release that stated Mac OS X Leopard would be delayed five months because the iPhone consumed too many resources [...] Last week’s keynote was when we, on the outside, finally saw the results. Apple today is firing on all cylinders.

There still haven't been many OS X os kernel-level since then (say, NFS+ is largely unchanged).

(But the point seems generally true other than that.)

Re: Only Apple

#37

There is always a lot of careful insight in Gruber's posts that I like but it is tainted with a type of enthusiasm that doesn't belong in journalism. Even if he is correct, being a cheerleader with liberal praise isn't analysis. It's opinion, and Gruber often reads like an opinionist. Apple is an amazing position to build all kinds of wonderful technology, and Samsung does come across as a shallow copy cat that throw…

The other problem is he just doesn't know anything about the industry he's writing on, because he's been a tunnel-vision mac fan for decades. Current example: just below this article he credits Amazon with inventing a button that connects you to live customer service. The counterexample to that claim is Bloomberg, whose terminals have a dedicated Help key. Striking this key once gets you a help screen, but if you hit…

credits Amazon with inventing a button that connects you to live customer service.

oh my glob. Willfully misunderstand the world much? He's talking about consumer devices. How many devices in your home that aren't $10,000/month stock terminals have live under-5-second video support?

Re: Only Apple

#38
post #13

Daring Fireball is hard to read because the website is so poorly formatted. I rarely make it past the first paragraph. The font is too small, the margins are too huge and the colors have poor contrast.

Yeah, avant garde doesn't really work for web design as soon as it starts impacing readability.

Re: Only Apple

#39
post #7

I find it hard to argue with any of the points he makes. I'm sure someone here will, but I found myself doing the mental "gulp of air and raising a finger" then getting silenced again. I really wish Microsoft had pulled off Windows Phone; it arguably had a much better user experience than Android did (and still does) -- and interesting Nokia hardware. I simply don't believe Google has the best interests of anyone at…

> I simply don't believe Google has the best interests of anyone at heart except themselves and advertisers. You think Apple has your interests at heart? Or Microsoft? Like Google, they have your cash at heart. Not a thing more.

Not everyone is as cynical as you. I believe the people at Apple genuinely want to make great hardware and software that enhances people's lives. Their world-class accessibility support is proof enough of that.

Re: Only Apple

#40
post #7

I find it hard to argue with any of the points he makes. I'm sure someone here will, but I found myself doing the mental "gulp of air and raising a finger" then getting silenced again. I really wish Microsoft had pulled off Windows Phone; it arguably had a much better user experience than Android did (and still does) -- and interesting Nokia hardware. I simply don't believe Google has the best interests of anyone at…

> I simply don't believe Google has the best interests of anyone at heart except themselves and advertisers. You think Apple has your interests at heart? Or Microsoft? Like Google, they have your cash at heart. Not a thing more.

It is a question of whose interests align with yours. Do your interests align with advertisers? Mine sure as hell don't.
Post reply on HN