Here's a working hypothesis: | Why is Amazon's security for replacement orders so lax? Amazon values customer satisfiction above their fraud write-off. | Why would they send a replacement to an address that has never been associated with me, and is in a wholly different state than the one the original item was sent to? Because the time between ordering an item, and defect can be sufficiently large to cover moves: peo…
> Amazon values customer satisfiction above their fraud write-off I do get this, and as an Amazon customer, I'm glad this is their stance overall, but on the other hand it seems like they could handle this situation more securely than they do. It seems to me that you could have some sane middle ground where you do no-questions asked replacements, but with some caveats like no ability to change the address the item is…
I fail to see what the "security" issue is, other than Amazon choosing to lose some money on fraud. That's not a security issue to anyone outside of Amazon, and Amazon seems clear in their stance.
Edit: A much bigger problem is Amazon's use of OnTrac, which repeatedly fails to make deliveries. Even in downtown SF.