It's pretty clear that Apple is positioning themselves in stark contrast to Google, they want to be the privacy/security company. Internet companies with advertising business models are a dime a dozen so that is a real advantage that differentiates Apple.
This. If you have access to the developer sessions from WWDC14 I urge you to look at the HealthKit, CloudKit & TouchID stuff. "We take privacy very seriously" was a recurring theme and seeing it baked into the new APIs made me smile. Very cool & reassuring move.
iOS 8 randomises the MAC address while scanning for WiFi networks
181–190 of 264 posts
Re: iOS 8 randomises the MAC address while scanning for WiFi networks
#182Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's pretty reasonable to expect a store would think of tracking a customer's path through the store. Websites do that all the time. In addition, if we find a good way to provide information to the store owner about how his or her store is being browsed and used, it is likely that stores will provide better shopping experiences.
Explain the downvote?
Then there's "better shopping experiences" which most people's BS translators will read as "worse shopping experiences / persuading people to spend more than they intended".
Re: iOS 8 randomises the MAC address while scanning for WiFi networks
#183Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think on the general principle of privacy. But also, the idea that the more trackable you are, the more easily manipulated you are by marketers and advertisers. Free markets work better the more consumers are rational. Giving marketers deep psychological and behavioral insight increasingly enables them to circumvent rationality and "hack" consumers in various ways.
Thanks for a constructive and very insightful response. This definitely seems to be a valid reason why people would be against being tracked. We don't want to be more easily manipulated (through the data that the ones doing tracking are able to acquire) and coerced into buying things we don't want/need (but the ones doing tracking want us to buy). Would it be accurate to describe it like this: the consumers' interest…
Have you met any humans lately? We all have divergent interests, differently expressed in different aspects of our lives. The entirety of law and politics is this.
Re: iOS 8 randomises the MAC address while scanning for WiFi networks
#184Earlier quoted context omitted.
User IBM's original comment was that Apple is going for the "privacy/security" persona, which is kind of impossible if they're not also acting as a "good citizen" worthy of trust with one's privacy and security.
Thanks, everyone, for reminding me why I stopped reading and commenting on Apple-related threads on HN. 27+ downvotes later, I still haven't changed my mind, but if you wish to try, logic works better than weak justifications for exploitative, sociopathic corporate behavior and targeted downvoting.
> I still haven't changed my mind
Well you should have. You've been thoroughly shot down. The fact you don't accept that says more about you than anyone else.
Re: iOS 8 randomises the MAC address while scanning for WiFi networks
#185Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's a flip side to this. Being less trackable means that any passive advertising or active marketing you do see is less tailored to your situation and needs. When I walk around I see many billboards advertising products for which I have no use (e.g. female hair care products). If tracking technology could replace those with things I actually might buy (even if male hair care products) then I would be a touch happ…
Do you know what companies never do? They never ask. I see dating ads, cars advertisements, feminine healthcare products, insurance ads, etc. What do I want to see? Travel accessories, computers, hardware, games, tech gadgets, etc. I never see these ads. Why doesn't Google say, hey, you're going to see Adsense all over the internet, advertisements before videos on YouTube, etc. Would you like to select a few categori…
Re: iOS 8 randomises the MAC address while scanning for WiFi networks
#186If this becomes the trend (which in my opinon would be nice) it will become a big problem for companies that specialise in customer tracking e.g. for supermarkets and big department stores. Previously it was quite easy to track a customer, how long he or she spends time in the store, which floors he or she visits, etc. by putting up dummy WiFI-networks that the customers phones find by giving out their MAC-addresses.
Face recognition comes to mind as a technology that can replace this, and perhaps as a result of the MAC scrambling we will see a bigger push for face recognition in stores.
Re: iOS 8 randomises the MAC address while scanning for WiFi networks
#187Earlier quoted context omitted.
> one of the advantages could be that they can optimize the store layout better so you don't have to walk as much to find what you want. But stores do not want to do that. Stores know you want a pint of milk and loaf of bread. They put these two items far apart which means you need to walk past all that other stuff, this increasing the chance you'll buy something else. Tracking technology isn't going to ne used to ma…
Depends what you're selling. A grocery store is like that since they operate on razor thin margins and making you impulse buy is how they are going to make more money. An Apple store is not laid out like that. I always see the big ticket items upfront and the accessories in the back. Most people don't impulse buy things that expensive.
You just walked past the shiny new things twice while you were there buying a cheap accessory. Maybe you noticed something you'll buy in the near future.
Meanwhile, the big ticket items are window dressing, and people who haven't bought an iDevice don't need accessories for one yet.
Re: iOS 8 randomises the MAC address while scanning for WiFi networks
#188Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not really transparency when what they have on you is far more extensive than what they show you. I'd say Google is for control as much as Apple, I'll concede openness vs. privacy which both sound like something spouted out by a suit.
> I'd say Google is for control as much as Apple, I'll concede openness vs. privacy which both sound like something spouted out by a suit. Naturally they are both vying for leverage. To borrow a line from The Lords of Strategy , "the key way to think about competitive advantage is to think about how to design ecology in such a way to achieve goals you’re trying to pursue" [1]. Apple monetises device sales. It fiercel…
Maybe flexible?
Re: iOS 8 randomises the MAC address while scanning for WiFi networks
#189Earlier quoted context omitted.
Without being too specific, you should assume that Large stores already do this. Any store claiming to have "in store wifi" is almost guaranteed to be tracking you through your mac address. The system that I'm familiar with only tracks where you're going. It didn't (as of a couple months ago) have any way of linking your mac back to a consumer profile.
I was in a shopping mall recently, where the free wifi required your name and an email address before letting you use it. Fuck that.
http://brazilsense.com/index.php?title=Wi-Fi_and_Internet_se...
They want your:
name
sex
marital status
nationality
place of birth
profession
identity document type
identity document number
street address
city
state
country
cellular phone number
name of cellular provider
landline phone number
email address
barcode from your boarding pass
If you think that this is an April Fool's joke, I can assure you that it's real. Some of the above are optional on the form that's shown, but other airport ISPs in Brazil do insist that you fill in a lot of fields like the above.I'm happy to say that the trend in the United States and Canada has been toward less or zero information for using wifi. Less than 10 years ago, it was quite common to see all sorts of questions to use wifi. And Internet cafes used to demand ID in the United States and Canada (and they still do in Brazil).
Re: iOS 8 randomises the MAC address while scanning for WiFi networks
#190Earlier quoted context omitted.
Explain the downvote?
Not my downvote, but I suspect people don't like the slippery slope argument ("tracking is omnipresent on the web, therefore it's OK to do it in the real world as well"). Then there's "better shopping experiences" which most people's BS translators will read as "worse shopping experiences / persuading people to spend more than they intended".