Also in Polish I encounter małpka (little or cute monkey) more than małpa (monkey), maybe that's a regional thing.
At
91–98 of 98 posts
Re: At
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
In the 80's it was not uncommon to hear "snabel-A" in Norway too, quite possibly because Danish and Swedish computer magazines were more commonly seen in Norway before more Norwegian magazines gained traction. "Alfrakrøll" was quite common for some time. Personally I don't think I've ever used krøllalfa - it just sounds dumb to me. "Alfrakrøll" is still what I'd prefer. Then again, I've lived outside of Norway for 14…
The Swedish is incorrectly reprinted by the TFA. It says "with an (elephant) trunk", while the referenced Tweet (by a Swedish person) says "elephant trunk A". The actual Swedish wording is "snabel-a", which is a compound word consisting of the two words "snabel" ([elephant] trunk) and "a" (the letter "a"). So the proper English translation of the Swedish name for the character @ would be something like "an A with a t…
In the early 90's when I was introduced to email, my father and his colleagues used to call it "kanelbulle", and that stuck with me. It wasn't until a few years later when email started to gain traction with the non-techie crowd I heard it being called "snabel-a".
Translation; "kanelbulle" is Swedish for "cinnamon roll/bun", because @ looks like one.
Re: At
#93No one actually uses „Klammeraffe“ in German. It’s just „at“ (English pronunciation – most of the time). I wonder how widespread the use of those alternative names for “at” is in other languages he lists. In German „Klammeraffe“ is this weird, unwieldy nickname that used to be somewhat fashionable a long time ago (mid-nineties maybe, whenever many people where first confronted with email addresses). I remember it bei…
The Dutch one "money tail" is more widespread than "at", I would say.
Re: At
#94Note, however, that the article does not distinguish between what the sign is called, and how it is read. I call it an "at sign". I read it "at". Now, in Dutch it's called a monkey tail (said in Dutch, of course). But that may not be how it is read in Dutch.
Re: At
#95Re: At
#96Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Swedish is incorrectly reprinted by the TFA. It says "with an (elephant) trunk", while the referenced Tweet (by a Swedish person) says "elephant trunk A". The actual Swedish wording is "snabel-a", which is a compound word consisting of the two words "snabel" ([elephant] trunk) and "a" (the letter "a"). So the proper English translation of the Swedish name for the character @ would be something like "an A with a t…
I'm from Sweden as well, and it took a while for me to hear it referred to as "kanelbulle". In the early 90's when I was introduced to email, my father and his colleagues used to call it "kanelbulle", and that stuck with me. It wasn't until a few years later when email started to gain traction with the non-techie crowd I heard it being called "snabel-a". Translation; "kanelbulle" is Swedish for "cinnamon roll/bun", b…
Re: At
#97In Catalan we call it arrova. It's interesting that, used as a unit of mass, the @ had different values in different places [1][2]: - Castille: 11.5002325 kg - Aragon: 12.5 kg - Catalonia: 26 pounds - Valencia: 30 pounds - Portugal: 32 pounds Apparently it's still used as a unit of measure in Spain and South America, for example for oranges [2] and cocaine [3]. [1] http://ca.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrova [2] http://es.wi…
The number of significant digits on the Castille version is ridiculous compared to the others. Could it be that Castille still uses this unit and therefore have such a specific translation value?