Live data from Hacker News

At

furbo.org

31–40 of 98 posts

Re: At

#31
post #26
post #2

I believe in Russian it's called "Sobachka", or "Doggy." (Correct me if I'm wrong.)

Собачка – a diminutive form for "dog" – can be used as a conversational word for "commercial at" (@). Собака (dog) is vulgar in many contexts in Russian.

Собака (sobaka) is the commonly used word for "@". It's not derogatory at all in this particular context.

Re: At

#32

In Norwegian the official name is "krøllalfa", meaning "curly alpha". Hip in the 90s, but I don't think I've heard anyone call it that in years. I was actually surprised when I learned that "at" was the proper English name and usage. I had always assumed it was a symbol that had been co-opted into network addresses because it was accessible from the keyboard and kinda looked like an a. One advantage of the internatio…

I always thought the English version was ampersat.

Sounds like it might be related to English "ampersand" (&), which goes back to Latin.

Re: At

#33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I believe they were saying "at the rate".

Not sure why people are downvoting you. The @ symbol is hundreds of years old and originally meant "at the rate of" (as in, "10 boxes @ $1" means "10 boxes for $1 apiece"). It's perfectly possible that the Indian population could have picked this up and perhaps contracted it a bit during the reign of the British Empire. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/@_symbol

That is indeed the case. The 'at the rate of' usage was quite popular in arithmetic problems even in the early 90s when most of the population was unaware of emails. My parents still say it as at the rate of when reading aloud an email address.

Re: At

#34
post #7

No one actually uses „Klammeraffe“ in German. It’s just „at“ (English pronunciation – most of the time). I wonder how widespread the use of those alternative names for “at” is in other languages he lists. In German „Klammeraffe“ is this weird, unwieldy nickname that used to be somewhat fashionable a long time ago (mid-nineties maybe, whenever many people where first confronted with email addresses). I remember it bei…

The Dutch one "money tail" is more widespread than "at", I would say.

Re: At

#37
post #22

All I can think is how much longer it must be to speak tweets aloud in other languages. As opposed to "at Jim Lipsey, at Gruber, at Chockenberry, at The Talk Show", now it's "chee-o-cho-la Jim Lipsey, chee-o-cho-la Gruber..." Sounds like a mouthful already.

IIRC latin languages offset longer words by speaking generally more syllables per second. The information per time unit is roughly equal across languages. I don't think they actually realize that the word is long/awkward (or at least not to the same degree an English native speaker would realize).

Re: At

#38
This is what I've been told: "木 = wood, 林 = woods, 森 = forest". Quite intuitive. :)

Re: At

#39
post #4
post #2

I believe in Russian it's called "Sobachka", or "Doggy." (Correct me if I'm wrong.)

Arrobase in french. Don't think it means anything.

Here you go:

> Le nom arobase, forme la plus fréquente, est une déformation récente du castillan arroba(s), qui désigne une unité de mesure de poids et de capacité (dite en français arrobe), en usage en Espagne et au Portugal8, de grandeur variable selon les régions et selon les liquides (huile ou vin). Ce terme, attesté en Espagne depuis 1088, vient lui-même de l'arabe الربع (ar-rubʿ), « le quart », pour un quart de l'ancien quintal de 100 livres, soit 12 kg environ. Depuis le xvie siècle, en effet, le mot arroba — parmi d'autres — s'est constamment écrit au moyen de l'abréviation "@"9.

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrobase

Re: At

#40
post #16

In Japanese, the sign itself is called "attomaaku" ("at mark") but it's pronounced as "atto" when dictated. So someone's email would be johnsmith-at-gmail-dot-com, and if you ask a Japanese person to pronounce the symbol, they would say "atto". However, if you show them the symbol and ask them _what it is_, they probably would say "attomaaku". Semiotics is fascinating.

"atto" is アット for アットマーク and you don't really pronounce the "to" so much in the end, unless you're really from the countryside or something. It's just that you need to have it to make the "t" sound coming from English.

Not sure what's so fascinating about that particular example in Japanese, there are much more interesting things in the language than this.

Post reply on HN